Search for: "McDonald v. State of California" Results 61 - 80 of 359
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2010, 8:12 am by Rick Hills
We had horse doctors’ doses of that sort of “rights” jurisprudence from the pre-Miller v California days, when the SCOTUS used to apply First Amendment obscenity doctrine by watching porno flicks in chambers. [read post]
1 Jul 2016, 2:55 am by Walter Olson
” And some are more audacious than creative, as when a California woman got in trouble after allegedly sending “faked treatment documents and burn photos from a hospital website” to bolster a hot coffee spill claim against McDonald’s. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 12:15 am
Recently, I took note of the fact that the California Supreme Court as granted review of EpicentRx, In.c v. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 10:10 am
But (1) I at least now know (for sure) what the law is according to the California Court of Appeal, and (2) Justice McDonald convinces me -- on the merits -- that the right answer may well be "Yes. [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 3:53 pm by Mike
McDonald is a petition for habeas corpus on both grounds listed above. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 11:07 am by Matthew Kahn
Drew in the Central District of California) and someone was sued under the CFAA for unauthorized use of Ticketmaster (that one was Ticketmaster L.L.C. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 4:40 pm by Shahram Miri
This would include applicable federal law, state law (namely the probate code) and the California Rules of Court. [read post]