Search for: "McDonald v. Strong"
Results 61 - 80
of 245
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2020, 8:04 am
It is being used by the largest organizations such as by way of example only social media giants Google, Facebook, LinkedIn, Instagram, Twitter, Alibaba, and Baidu online and offline retailers such as Amazon and Walmart luxury brands like Apple, Burberry, and Louis Vuitton producers of consumer products such as Kimberly-Clark, Unilver, Coca-Cola foodservices providers such as Dominos Pizza, Starbucks, and McDonalds, healthcare providers such as Google, IBM, Elsevier, Tencent entertainment… [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 10:12 am
If Amazon v. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 9:58 am
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit’s NLRB v. [read post]
19 Jan 2020, 6:43 am
Restaurant workers in Salazar v. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:00 am
Democrats argue the Trump administration’s stonewalling –including trying to stop subpoenaed witnesses from testifying and blocking the executive branch from turning over documents – creates a strong case the president has infringed on the separation of powers and undercut lawmakers’ oversight duties as laid out in the Constitution. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 12:00 pm
The following is a series of questions posed by Ronald Collins to Corey Robin in connection with Robin’s new book, “The Enigma of Clarence Thomas” (Metropolitan Books, 2019). [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 1:17 am
Alexandra Mezulanik, research assistant at UCL IBIL, examines the much anticipated decision in Martin v Kogan of the Court of Appeal of England and Wales. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm
Although marriage is a fundamental right, this is not a case—like Loving or, more recently, Obergefell v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am
National/Federal Campaigns Say They’ll Match Political Contributions. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 11:58 am
It’s a strong opinion, and I commend it to you. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 9:49 am
By Seth Fortin, Esther Slater McDonald, and Jennifer A. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 7:31 am
In this case, veterans can point to Pratt v. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 9:00 pm
In this case, veterans can point to Pratt v. [read post]
10 May 2019, 11:37 am
McDonald, this Court held that “an agreement in advance to waive or not plead the statutes of limitation is void as against public policy. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 1:02 pm
To read the State Bar’s response and related filings in McDonald v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 1:02 pm
To read the State Bar’s response and related filings in McDonald v. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 2:50 pm
Silbey: Interaction b/t TM and other fields matters here—bankruptcy.Lemley: Lynn LoPucki suggested that we could take franchising more seriously—if you hold yourself out as a McDonald’s, you’re a McDonald’s and your employees are McDonald’s employees.McKenna: confusion isn’t found in nature; you have to know where to look to do a survey and once you ask a set of people you’ve defined a market. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 12:20 pm
On this record, holding that the ban is constitutional as applied to Kanter does not “put[] the government through its paces,” see Williams, 616 F.3d at 692, but instead treats the Second Amendment as a “second-class right, subject to an entirely different body of rules than the other Bill of Rights guarantees,” McDonald v. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 7:34 am
McDonald, 823 F.3d 630, 639 (Fed. [read post]
29 Jul 2018, 1:14 pm
And it is a strong one. [read post]
