Search for: "McGinnis v. McGinnis" Results 61 - 80 of 194
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2016, 5:36 am
No caselaw made clear to McGinnis that the latter choice was a constitutionally impermissible one.Lange v. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 3:21 pm by Walter Olson
And his majority opinion in Wal-Mart v. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Patrick Yingling of Reed Smith on Universal Health Services, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2015, 7:29 am by Stephen Griffin
  But contrary to McGinnis and Rappaport, I think FDR had multiple good reasons for avoiding the amendment route. [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 8:42 am by JB
Constructions can and do change over time without Article V amendment. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:18 pm by Walter Olson
Go for clarity rather than depth of feeling, advises Paul Horwitz [PrawfsBlawg] Re: AMK’s revival of substantive due process, warns John McGinnis, libertarians should be careful what they wish for [Law and Liberty] Tags: judges, same-sex marriage, Supreme CourtWhat Anthony Kennedy could have learned from Brown v. [read post]
31 May 2015, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
“Laura & Marvin Horne’s Story”, video on raisin takings case, features the great Michael McConnell [YouTube, earlier] Actor Edward Gero shines as Antonin Scalia in new stage play The Originalist but script doesn’t really understand originalists or Federalist Society types, thinks John McGinnis [City Journal] McGinnis on the difference between “big”/philosophical cases and normal cases at the Supreme Court [Liberty and Law] Ninth… [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 1:01 pm by Corey Brettschneider
Corey Brettschneider & Nelson TebbeLast week, the Court heard arguments in Walker v. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 8:05 am
But Parts V and VI, which focus on federalism and property rights, emphasize that these are crucial areas where libertarian ideas have entered the mainstream primarily by being taken up by conservative (and often originalist) judges. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 8:52 am by Harold O'Grady
In Originalism and the Good Constitution, John McGinnis and Michael Rappaport argue that it ought to change in only one way: through the formal mechanisms set out in the Constitution’s own Article V. [read post]