Search for: "McKenna v. May" Results 61 - 80 of 426
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2016, 2:03 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Ct. case: the court says you may not do that. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 6:52 pm by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
That in some cases it may be very valuable property is manifest. [read post]
19 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
Both cases affirmed Supreme Court Nassau County decisions setting aside the prenuptial agreements in issue, Now, in an October 15, 2014 decision in McKenna v. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 4:19 am by John Enser
On 21 December 2017, the last day of the English High Court term, Arnold J issued a short judgment in the case of Union Des Associations Européennes de Football (better known as UEFA) v BT and Os [2017] EWHC 3414 (Ch), available on Bailii here. [read post]
18 May 2012, 12:02 pm by Record on Appeal
On May 16, 2012, the Hawaii Supreme Court issued an opinion authored by Chief Justice Recktenwald in Bonnie MacLeod Kakinami v. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 2:49 pm
The only two federal appellate courts to have addressed this question have answered "no," see McKenna v. [read post]
13 Apr 2013, 7:51 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Final registration rate is 60 v. 40%. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 7:04 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (on the application of SM (Rwanda) (AP)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 10 May 2021 Kostal UK v Dunkley and Ors, heard 18 May 2021 Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 In the matter of an application by Margaret McQuillan for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), In the matter of an application by Mary McKenna for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), and In the matter of an… [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 4:32 am by INFORRM
The judgment is also a cautionary tale for solicitors to ensure the accuracy of its client’s witness statements and their duties to the Court when evidence emerges which may be contrary to earlier findings of fact by the Court. [read post]