Search for: "McKinney v. State Bar" Results 61 - 80 of 93
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Dec 2008, 12:00 pm
  Therefore, the default provisions of the Limited Liability Company Law apply (see Overhoff v Scarp, Inc., 12 Misc 3d 350, 359; Matter of Spires v Lighthouse Solutions, LLC, 4 Misc 3d 428, 435; Rich, Practice Commentaries, McKinney's Cons Laws of NY, Book 32A, 1[A], at 176). [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 9:56 am by Wolfgang Demino
What's more, "the United States Supreme Court has barred any use of the sixth factor and advised that the second factor generally cannot be used as a ground for enhancing the award. [read post]
11 May 2023, 2:32 am by centerforartlaw
For example, when descendants of victims undertake litigation to reclaim wrongfully dispossessed property, their claims may be barred if they fail to prove an artwork was improperly transferred or, alternatively, may be barred on technical defenses before the court addresses the substantive matter.[15] Additionally, conflicts between descendants and current possessors of art works may be resolved and the piece restituted to descendants before a museum acquires it for its… [read post]
8 May 2019, 10:30 am by Matthew Scott Johnson
Beyer traveled to McKinney, Texas and the Collin County Courthouse where he was invited to speak for the Estate Planning/Probate Section of the Collin County Bar Association. [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 12:30 pm by John Ross
District court: Pre-restraint claims are barred by Heck v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 3:19 am by Peter Mahler
However, the Supreme Court incorrectly determined that the subsequent contributions by Man Choi Chiu should be treated as capital contributions, and not as loans, as the record was bereft of any evidence of an agreement between the members to such treatment (see Mizrahi v Cohen, 104 AD3d 917, 920; Matter of KSI Rockville v Eichengrun, 305 AD2d 681; Rich, Practice Commentaries, McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 32A, 2014 Cumulative Pocket Part, at 72). [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
Accordingly, assuming, without deciding, that Senator Skelos presently has standing to sue the Governor, we now proceed to the merits (see Matter of New York State Assn. of Criminal Defense Lawyers v Kaye, 96 NY2d 512, 516 [2001]; Babigian v Wachtler, 69 NY2d 1012, 1013 [1987]; Matter of Roman Catholic Diocese of Albany v New York State Dept. of Health, 66 NY2d 948, 951 [1985]). [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 9:35 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Committee Report on Court Reorganization [1962], Family Ct.Act, p. 2, McKinney Session Laws, 1962, p. 3430). [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:29 pm
Torres, No. 072331 Sentence of 188 to 235 months for possession of crack cocaine with intent to distribute is affirmed where: 1) the court did not abuse its discretion in counting both the state drug offense and the state gun offense as contributing to defendant's status as a career offender; 2) the district court was correct in finding the state gun conviction to be a "crime of violence" for career-offender purposes; and 3) district court was compelled to… [read post]
28 May 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
Some distinguish private university libraries by stating that there is no public right to use them. [read post]