Search for: "McMahan"
Results 61 - 80
of 147
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2014, 9:16 pm
Mit Beiträgen von: Jeff McMahan, David Luban, David Rodin, Jeremy Waldron, Uwe Steinhoff, Robert G. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 12:01 am
" Contents include: Jeff McMahan, Précis: The Morality and Law of WarGeorge P. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 10:01 am
But, McMahan argued, the underlying moral principles are simply not true. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 6:41 am
Here. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 2:19 pm
I have written before about similar such bills proposed in the legislatures of Minnesota and West Virginia.Angela McMahan was one such abused woman in Colorado. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 3:24 am
Last week an event was held at Columbia Law School in honor of the book's release.For me, the most interesting of the many speakers was philosopher Jeff McMahan, who focused on the eighth and last chapter of the book. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 3:19 am
But McMahan acknowledges that for the time being we must stick with the rules that we have. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 8:43 am
But McMahan acknowledges that for the time being we must stick with the rules that we have. [read post]
8 May 2012, 1:58 am
I reject McMahan's suggestion that at the deepest moral level it is sometimes justified to violate these legal protections of non-combatants and prisoners. [read post]
8 May 2022, 7:16 am
As a result, the modern law of war tracks the revisionist just war theory associated with Jeff McMahan more closely than the conventionalist just war theory associated with Michael Walzer, though the transformation is not yet complete. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 1:15 am
Lucas, The Strategy of Graceful DeclineJeff McMahan, Proportionality in the Afghanistan WarDarrel Moellendorf, Jus ex Bello in AfghanistanFernando R. [read post]
23 Jul 2007, 11:51 am
McMahan, issued Friday. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 3:29 am
Part II attempts to identify the conditions under which individuals lose their moral immunity from direct attack, partly by critically examining an analogy drawn by Jeff McMahan between these conditions and the legal doctrine of criminal complicity. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 9:45 pm
In particular, McMahan argues that its legal advantages need not be lost if we reject it as a moral principle. [read post]
29 May 2019, 9:06 am
This spring, for the first time since then I have been working with a candidate for Buffalo Common Council and although the experience has been interesting, and although I think Melanie McMahan is supremely well qualified I gotta say that I now have a better understanding about what Ray was getting at than I ever imagined. [read post]
11 Jun 2016, 12:59 am
It is argued that the current philosophical critique of IHL by Jeff McMahan focused on individual moral liability to attack is an intellectual dead-end and that the morally best rules are international laws that are the same for all fighters. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 8:00 am
Symposium on Victor Tadros’ The Ends of Harm Rutgers Institute for Law and Philosophy Rutgers University, School of Law –Camden March 30-31, 2012 Participants Vera Bergelson (Rutgers-Newark Law) Mitch Berman (Texas Law) Michelle Dempsey (Villanova Law) Antony Duff (Minnesota Law and Stirling Philosophy) Kim Ferzan (Rutgers-Camden Law) Adil Haque (Rutgers-Newark Law) Doug Husak (Rutgers, New Brunswick, Philosophy) Jeff McMahan (Rutgers, New Brunswick, Philosophy) Victor… [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 10:02 pm
The contributors are:Elizabeth AndersonRoger CrispGerald DworkinFred FeldmanDavid HeydThomas HurkaJeff McMahan Jan NarvesonOnora O'Neill Ingmar PerssonJanet Radcliffe RichardsPeter Singer John SkorupskiMichael A. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 12:09 pm
If accurate, Schneider’s account suggests the drama on the Court is “devolving into a storyline only Vince McMahan could love. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 3:55 am
...at Quartz. [read post]
