Search for: "Means v. Brooks"
Results 61 - 80
of 895
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2018, 6:39 am
SUNY Stony Brook, decided on January 29. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 8:56 am
United States and Gould v. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 4:05 am
Timothy’s Episcopal Church v. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 11:12 am
Under the canon of constitutional avoidance, constitutional issues in a case should not be ruled on if a case can be resolved by other means. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 7:41 am
As most lawyers know, it is a challenge to ever know what a judgment really means, especially one as long as Mr Justice Birss' latest decision in Unwired Planet v Huawei [2017] EWHC 711. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 6:54 am
Ancestry Court Casts Doubt on the Legality of the Data Brokerage Industry–Brooks v. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 10:57 pm
That's the rule in Fisher v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 4:53 pm
Even assuming, arguendo, that the court advised defendant of the scheduled trial date and warned him that the trial would proceed in his absence if he failed to appear (see generally People v Parker, 57 NY2d 136, 141), we conclude that the court failed to inquire into defendant’s absence and to recite “on the record the facts and reasons it relied upon in determining that defendant’s absence was deliberate” (People v Brooks, 75 NY2d 898, 899, mot to… [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 4:53 pm
Even assuming, arguendo, that the court advised defendant of the scheduled trial date and warned him that the trial would proceed in his absence if he failed to appear (see generally People v Parker, 57 NY2d 136, 141), we conclude that the court failed to inquire into defendant’s absence and to recite “on the record the facts and reasons it relied upon in determining that defendant’s absence was deliberate” (People v Brooks, 75 NY2d 898, 899, mot to amend… [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 2:13 pm
 Plessey v. [read post]
11 May 2017, 9:06 am
A recent case of Government Legal Service –v- Brookes considered a recruitment process to the Government Legal Service (GLS). [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 4:05 pm
Comment Interim libel injunctions are relatively rare but can be granted if “it is clear that no defence will succeed at the trial”(Greene v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2005] QB 972 per Brooke LJ at [57]). [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 7:49 pm
App. 2012) involved a general question of legal sufficiency in light of the recent case, Brooks v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 9:36 am
Josh has shown me true strength and what sacrifice truly means. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 2:08 pm
That means—at least to same-sex marriage proponents—that Bostic v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 6:00 pm
In Brooks Cotton Co. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 9:38 am
OCTANE FITNESS In the opinion delivered by Justice Sotomayor, the Court, in a 9-0 decision, construed the term “exceptional” in its plain and ordinary meaning and held that exceptional means “uncommon,” “rare,” and “not ordinary. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 11:15 am
Summary In the recent decision in Brook Construction (2007) Inc. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 10:30 am
” In Davis v. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 4:41 am
Today we revisit McCarthy v. [read post]