Search for: "Means v. Sears, Roebuck & Co." Results 61 - 80 of 91
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Oct 2010, 5:31 am by Russell Jackson
Sears, Roebuck & Co., 547 F.3d 742 (7th Cir. 2008), observing that by ensuring that the class action is premised on the realistic prospect of a remedy that the class members could not otherwise obtain, the court is also protecting the interests of absent class members, who may have different interests than those of class action lawyers who want to obtain a fee for providing the same or similar relief. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 4:30 am by Steve McConnell
Sears, Roebuck and Co., 547 F.3d 742 (7th Cir. 2008). [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 2:48 am
Sears, Roebuck & Co., 722 F.2d 1542, 1548 (Fed. [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 11:56 am
Part V identifies key unresolved issues in the state courts. [read post]
1 Nov 2008, 3:12 am
(IPKat) United States US General 2005 civil damages awards in state courts rarely broke $1M according to report released by US Justice Department (Law360) Changes to expert witness rules draws critisism (Law360) Collaborative law and intellectual property cases (The IP ADR Blog) Democrats victory could mean a new focus on civil suits (Law360) Election could drastically affect appeals court makeup (Law360) Ethics case survey: when is attorney-client privilege waived? [read post]