Search for: "Mechanical Contractors v. State"
Results 61 - 80
of 613
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2020, 8:26 am
In Summit Community Bank v. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 6:00 am
However, the Superior Court decided in Commerce Bank/Harrisburg, N.A. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 2:50 pm
In Peaches, the Fourth Department enforced a mechanic’s lien filed by a contractor who was hired by a tenant and had no direct relationship with the landlord/owner. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 2:50 pm
In Peaches, the Fourth Department enforced a mechanic’s lien filed by a contractor who was hired by a tenant and had no direct relationship with the landlord/owner. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 6:00 am
In US ex rel Damuth Services v. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 12:55 pm
In United States ex rel. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 10:50 am
Scottco Mechanical Contractors, Inc., No. 07-13-00393-CV, (Tex. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 5:51 am
Until the Supreme Court filed its June 17, 2022 opinion in Borst Brothers Construction, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 5:51 am
Until the Supreme Court filed its June 17, 2022 opinion in Borst Brothers Construction, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 5:52 am
In Sherwood Steel Ltd. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 7:33 am
As I wrote in Opp v. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 2:02 am
App. 1990), the owner moved to dismiss the contractor's action to foreclose a mechanic's lien. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 8:47 am
This conclusion was firmly based on Paedergat Boat and Racquet Club, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 1:45 pm
Co. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 1:45 pm
Co. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2014, 5:50 am
Lee v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 10:46 am
Second, the terms of the tender contract itself created a “reasonable objection” discretionary mechanism for refusal to carry a bid. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 1:16 pm
In US ex rel Damuth Services v. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 6:08 am
Enbridge claimed that the contractor damaged the pipe when using a mechanical digging device to uncover a leaking septic tank. [read post]
30 Apr 2008, 5:47 am
In a decision issued on April 21, 2008, Bell BCI Company v, United States, the United States Court of Federal Claims issued a decision that can only be described as a “slam dunk” for the contractor. [read post]
