Search for: "Medical Board of California v. Superior Court"
Results 61 - 80
of 149
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2012, 5:38 pm
Superior Court (2009) 176 Cal.App.4th 1407, 1416 and Griffiths v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 11:01 am
Superior Court, while also specifying some heavily-lobbied-for exemptions. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 11:20 am
DePuy, BC456086, California Superior Court, Los Angeles County (Los Angeles). [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 6:47 am
Centinela Hospital Medical Center, 521 F.3d 1097 (U.S. [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 7:43 am
California resource guide for cerebral palsy and individuals with special needs. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 4:52 pm
Board of Administration (1994) 30 Cal.App.4th 539, 545; Guthrey v. [read post]
8 Nov 2024, 9:28 am
Hamilton is the Former Assistant Secretary and Deputy Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 10:01 am
The County may also bring a civil action in Superior Court. [read post]
8 Feb 2009, 8:03 pm
The Court rejected the effort to force non-statutory claims into arbitration; the court also found the arbitration provisions to be unconscionable.A California case, Treo @ Kettner Homeowners Association v. [read post]
6 May 2009, 9:06 am
Board of Medical Examiners (1974) 11 C3d 1, 21; Binder v. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 3:47 pm
The cases, listed newest to oldest, and the Court’s summaries are as follows: Union of Medical Marijuana Patients, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 8:53 am
In 2008, the California Supreme Court addressed this issue in Save Tara v. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 10:57 am
Allergan USA, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 12:41 pm
[T]the FDA-approved labeling did, in fact, indicate that the approved dose of [the drug] was superior. . . . [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 2:01 pm
Superior Court (Johnson) (2015) 61 Cal.4th 696 [California Supreme Court held that even prosecutors must comply with the Pitchess procedures if they seek information from confidential peace officer personnel records]). [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 5:06 pm
AB 5 codifies the California Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:26 pm
The proposition was designed to ensure that “seriously ill” residents of the State have access to marijuana for medical purposes, and to encourage Federal and State Governments to take steps toward ensuring the safe and affordable distribution of the drug to patients in need. * * * *Respondents Angel Raich and Diane Monson are California residents who suffer from a variety of serious medical conditions and have sought to avail themselves of… [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 9:00 am
“Strong” v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 4:04 pm
The cases, listed newest to oldest, and the Court’s summaries are as follows: Union of Medical Marijuana Patients, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 4:07 am
District Court for the Southern District of California. [read post]
