Search for: "Medical Dept."
Results 61 - 80
of 1,884
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2010, 6:00 am
It seems the U of I, Dept. of Neurology is being proven wrong. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 2:37 pm
My medical necessity summary judgment crusade continues. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 2:34 pm
Term 2d Dept. 2010) “At trial, defendant’s doctor testified that the services provided were not medically necessary, and defendant also admitted into evidence a copy of the doctor’s affirmed peer review report, which was to the same effect. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 12:17 pm
Term 2d Dept. 2012) Since each medical provider as assignee of a purportedly injured party has its own right to chose litigation or arbitration, the decision of one medical provider cannot prejudice another medical provider or assignor. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 11:21 am
Attorneys’ Offices throughout Alabama, Kentucky, Ohio, Virginia, Tennessee, and West Virginia to prosecute medical professionals and others involved in the illegal prescription and distribution of opioids. [read post]
Ninth Circuit Briefing in City of Yreka’s Effort to Block Karuk Trust Acquisition for Medical Center
1 May 2012, 6:48 am
Salazar: City of Yreka Opening Brief Interior Dept Brief Lower court materials here. [read post]
20 May 2024, 6:00 am
Accordingly, the portion of the appeal challenging respondent’s medical examination directive must be dismissed as untimely (Appeal of A.D., 46 Ed Dept Rep 236, Decision No. 15,492). [read post]
20 May 2024, 6:00 am
Accordingly, the portion of the appeal challenging respondent’s medical examination directive must be dismissed as untimely (Appeal of A.D., 46 Ed Dept Rep 236, Decision No. 15,492). [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 4:00 pm
Lewis, 56 A.D.3d 15 (2d Dept. 2008), the Second Department held that an orthopedist performing an independent medical examination (IME) on a plaintiff committed negligence, and not medical malpractice, when he allegedly rotated plaintiff’s head in a rough manner during the IME, causing injury to the plaintiff. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 12:15 pm
Andaz, 8 AD 3d 470 – NY: Appellate Div., 2nd Dept. 2004, provides that a resident who assists a doctor during a medical procedure, and who does not exercise any independent medical judgment, cannot be held liable for malpractice as long as the doctor’s directions did not so greatly deviate from normal practice that the resident should be held liable for failing to intervene. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 11:59 am
Big news in asbestos: Wayne County, Mich. judge throws out medical opinions by prolific Lansing internist Michael Kelly [Free Press, earlier] Law is what they say it is dept.: Oklahoma high court tosses out another chunk of liability reform,... [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 7:04 pm
., 2011 NY Slip Op 02379 (2d Dept. 2011) “The plaintiff hospital, as assignee of Bartolo Reyes, was awarded judgment against the defendant in the principal sum of $416,039.42, in this action to recover no-fault medical benefits under a contract of insurance entered into between the [...] [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 9:05 pm
Commissioner of Labor, ___A.D.3d____(3d Dept. [read post]
18 Dec 2010, 12:52 pm
Co. 2010 NY Slip Op 09256 (2d Dept. 2010) “The testimony of an employee of the company that handled the plaintiff’s medical billing was insufficient to lay a foundation for the admission of the claim forms under the business records exception of the hearsay rule (see Art of Healing Medicine, [...] [read post]
14 Jul 2022, 10:10 am
Krawiec and Michael Rees (National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)Dept. of Economics, Stanford University, Thomas Jefferson University, University of Virginia, School of Law and University of Toledo Medical Center)... [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 9:12 pm
Erie County Medical Center, ___A.D.3d___(4th Dept. [read post]
18 Feb 2004, 12:04 pm
In Wednesday's tax law news, Champaign Illinois' News-Gazette reports today that the Illinois Dept. of Revenue has ruled that Provena Covenant Medical Center is not a tax-exempt non profit organization. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 4:22 pm
Term 1st Dept. 2011) “[t]he report of defendant’s peer review doctor, which relied on the assignor’s medical records , raised a triable issue of fact as to whether the services provided by plaintiff were medically necessary . [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 3:00 am
The fact that the Dept. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 10:05 am
Term 2d Dept. 2010) “In opposition to defendant’s motion, plaintiff submitted an affirmation executed by Dr. [read post]
