Search for: "Mendez v. Mendez"
Results 61 - 80
of 397
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2010, 12:50 pm
Mendez, Slip Op. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 8:35 am
In Valdez v. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
In Bond v Lichtenstein (pdf), decided July 15, 2014, Justice Mendez granted a mother summary judgment in lieu of complaint under C.P.L.R. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 2:53 am
Judith Mendez v. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 11:58 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 7:38 am
” The Mendezes respond that, in fact, the court has suggested (in a different Fourth Amendment context, Kentucky v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 8:24 am
Yesterday’s argument in County of Los Angeles v. [read post]
10 Oct 2012, 8:50 am
In Florida Department of Agriculture And Consumer Services v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 2:02 pm
District Judge John Mendez heard oral arguments in Sacramento in the federal government's suit against California over a triad of state laws. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 6:32 pm
In the Immigration Policy Cnter's latest Perspectives on Immigration, Maria Blanco, Executive Director for the Chief Justice Earl Warren Institute at Berkeley Law, examines the impact of a federal circuit court's 1947 decision which found the segregation of immigration families'... [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 9:32 am
Evidence Lineup identifications; suggestiveness [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 8:15 am
Yesterday, Federal District Judge John Mendez in Sacramento issued his decision on the federal government's motion for a preliminary injunction in the California "sanctuary state" case, United States v. [read post]
13 May 2008, 2:42 pm
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW, CIVIL PROCEDURE, IMMIGRATION LAW Mendez v. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 12:10 am
US v. [read post]
29 Sep 2022, 10:56 am
Mendez, et al. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 6:25 pm
" But Judge Mendez concludes that "the constitutionality of Section 1373 [is] highly suspect" after the Supreme Court's recent decision in Murphy v. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 6:42 am
Mendez v. [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 5:14 am
As to applying the doctrine of estoppel in this case, Judge Mendez ruled that the doctrine could only be applied against a governmental entity if failure to apply the doctrine would defeat a right legally and rightfully obtained.Citing Freda v. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 1:57 pm
Mendez v. [read post]