Search for: "Merck/Schering-Plough Pharmaceuticals" Results 61 - 69 of 69
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2011, 7:09 am by Peter Rost
Rost performs expert witness testimony: Patent Infringement, Pharmaceutical Marketing, Drug Product Liability, Drug Marketing and Promotion, Drug Sales. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 12:07 pm by Peter Rost
Rost performs expert witness testimony: Patent Infringement, Pharmaceutical Marketing, Drug Product Liability, Drug Marketing and Promotion, Drug Sales. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 12:07 pm by Peter Rost
Rost performs expert witness testimony: Patent Infringement, Pharmaceutical Marketing, Drug Product Liability, Drug Marketing and Promotion, Drug Sales. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 12:08 pm by Peter Rost
Rost performs expert witness testimony: Patent Infringement, Pharmaceutical Marketing, Drug Product Liability, Drug Marketing and Promotion, Drug Sales. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
Superior Court, 920 P.2d 1347, 1353 (Cal. 1996) ("if state-of-the-art scientific data concerning the alleged risk was fully disclosed to the FDA and it determined, after review, that the pharmaceutical manufacturer was not permitted to warn. . .the FDA's conclusion that there was, in effect, no known risk is controlling"); Kelso v. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 3:40 am
, Schering-Plough Corp – Following dispute over trade dress with Schering-Plough, Fruit of the Earth announces plan to change its package design: (IP Law360), US: Quanta and its impact on biotechnology: (Holman’s Biotech IP Blog), US: BIO files amicus brief asking CAFC to cabin in scope of KSR and hold that its obvious to try dicta does not abrogate the Deuel standard: In re Kubin: (Patently-O), US: StemCells gets patent on enriched central… [read post]
16 Aug 2009, 11:23 am
(Editor's Note: This post is based on a Simpson Thacher & Bartlett memorandum, which first appeared as an article in the New York Law Journal.) [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am by Beck, et al.
As we said last week, because it’s a Dechert case, we can’t comment directly on Clark v. [read post]