Search for: "Merck/Schering-Plough Pharmaceuticals"
Results 61 - 69
of 69
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2008, 12:23 am
Will Merck & Schering-Plough be indicted for their ENHANCE shenanigans? [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 3:40 am
, Schering-Plough Corp – Following dispute over trade dress with Schering-Plough, Fruit of the Earth announces plan to change its package design: (IP Law360), US: Quanta and its impact on biotechnology: (Holman’s Biotech IP Blog), US: BIO files amicus brief asking CAFC to cabin in scope of KSR and hold that its obvious to try dicta does not abrogate the Deuel standard: In re Kubin: (Patently-O), US: StemCells gets patent on enriched central… [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:52 am
This marketing effort helped drug makers Merck and Schering-Plough gain a 15 percent market share for cholesterol lowing drugs in the US. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 1:30 pm
In a crushing blow to consumers, on Thursday, February 21st, the United States Supreme Court again sided with big pharmaceutical medical device makers. [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 11:04 am
It is jointly marketed by Merck and Schering-Plough. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 7:03 am
Schering-Plough Corp., 2006 WL 2546494, at *2 (E.D. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 12:08 pm
Schering-Plough Corp., 367 N.J. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 10:16 am
Schering-Plough Corp., 842 A.2d 174, 178 (N.J. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
Superior Court, 920 P.2d 1347, 1353 (Cal. 1996) ("if state-of-the-art scientific data concerning the alleged risk was fully disclosed to the FDA and it determined, after review, that the pharmaceutical manufacturer was not permitted to warn. . .the FDA's conclusion that there was, in effect, no known risk is controlling"); Kelso v. [read post]
