Search for: "Meyer v. Signs" Results 61 - 80 of 228
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jul 2018, 4:49 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
[USA] v Johnston, 145 AD3d 1240, 1240 [2016]; Matter of Barnes v Venettozzi, 135 AD3d 1250, 1251 [2016]; Rodriguez v Jacoby & Meyers, LLP, 126 AD3d 1183, 1184-1185 [2015], lv denied 25 NY3d 912 [2015]). [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 3:23 pm by Guest Author
The United States Supreme Court today, on Wednesday June 27, 2018, reversed the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals in Janus v. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 5:29 am by Chris Seaton
No less an authority than the United States Supreme Court declared this a non-issue this year when they denied certiorari in Davis v. [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 11:30 am by Venkat Balasubramani
(My blog post on the trial court ruling here: “Judge Declines to Enforce Uber’s Terms of Service–Meyer v. [read post]
25 May 2017, 5:00 am by David Meyer Lindenberg
Note: David Meyer-Lindenberg crosses the President and General Counsel of the Institute for Justice, Scott Bullock, one of the nation’s foremost opponents of eminent-domain abuse. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 3:01 am by David Meyer Lindenberg
David Meyer-Lindenberg crosses Ed Whelan, President of the Ethic and Public Policy Center and a leading conservative voice on Supreme Court nominees. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:09 am by SHG
David Meyer-Lindenberg crosses Chairman of the Board of Cato Institute, Robert Levy. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 4:45 am by SHG
David Meyer-Lindenberg and I crossed Kathryn Kase, past-Executive Director of Texas Defender Services, now back to the trenches fighting Texas’ love of execution. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 1:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
To achieve the vital goal of substantially reforming existing food systems in the United States in the context of changing climatic, political, and sociolegal conditions, the panelists will articulate their visions of the centrality of interracial justice to confronting food oppression and cultivating Furthering Liberty for People With Disabilities Post- Meyer v. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 7:55 pm by Timothy P. Flynn
The Virginia case is consistent from a published decision from the Michigan Court of Appeals, Meyer v Mitnick, that sprang from the Oakland County Circuit Court.In the Oakland County case from 2001, the engagement ring donor, a well-to-do physician, requested that his intended execute a prenuptial agreement. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 10:27 am by 802050david
Supreme Court Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/sct/2016-2017update.html Petition was filed in Meyers v. [read post]