Search for: "Michael D. Means"
Results 61 - 80
of 4,591
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2024, 9:03 pm
The Supreme Court articulated the meaning of materiality in cases in the 1970s and 1980s.[6] It is this standard of materiality that is reflected in Commission rules.[7] It is this same materiality standard that appears in numerous disclosure rules governing registration statements and public company annual reports.[8] It is this same materiality standard that is used throughout the final rules we’re considering today. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 5:59 am
This does not, however, necessarily mean that customers would be worse off. [read post]
2 Mar 2024, 9:18 am
Observatory on Practices Michael S. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 5:57 am
Report published in 1989 by the NIALRA which pledged to do ‘everything within its means’ to extend the 1967 Abortion Act to Northern Ireland © Northern Ireland Abortion Law Reform Association In June, a case brought to the UK Supreme Court by the NIHRC (Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission) was dismissed on the grounds that the NIHRC themselves could not bring the case to court.[7] Significantly, however, a majority of judges agreed that abortion law in Northern Ireland… [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 4:54 am
Michael Rios and Akanksha Sharma report for CNN. [read post]
25 Feb 2024, 8:30 pm
Murray, Michael D., Artificial Intelligence for Academic Support in Law Schools and Universities (September 6, 2023). [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 10:23 am
Hidden in ordinary case b/c the use complained of is the D’s use to create the D’s work. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 1:23 pm
Disney President Michael Ovitz walked away with a $130 million severance payment after just over a year of work. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:05 pm
Mitchell’s construction of that term, in other words, is the furthest thing from the “original public meaning. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 9:24 am
” Rewarding such behavior with hours of Senate floor time would only invite further degradation of the meaning and purpose of impeachment, which was intended as a solemn power. [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 10:55 am
None of this means that Trump is out of the woods. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:41 pm
So whatever means there are to enforce it would suggest that they have to be federal, national means. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
"[12] Meanwhile, a New Hampshire newspaper blamed "[t]raitors in the old lady's Cabinet" for "supply[ing] the conspirators with the means of insurrection from the public arsenals," such that "General Scott [was] hampered in his measures to defend the capital. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:45 pm
Richard D. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm
If we assume, as Trump does here for the sake of this argument, that Trump is covered by Section 3 and that he did engage in an insurrection—which is what Colorado determined to be the case—then it is much more than reasonable for Colorado to assume, as it did with Abdul Hassan, that Trump cannot and will not assume the office of President, despite the (wholly) theoretical possibility that two-thirds of both Houses might vote to alleviate his… [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:02 pm
If we assume, as Trump does here for the sake of this argument, that Trump is covered by Section 3 and that he did engage in an insurrection—which is what Colorado determined to be the case—then it is much more than reasonable for Colorado to assume, as it did with Abdul Hassan, that Trump cannot and will not assume the office of President, despite the (wholly) theoretical possibility that two-thirds of both Houses might vote to alleviate his… [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 10:50 am
School of Law (for more, read the whole thing): Howard University School of Law expelled Michael Newman. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 5:22 am
”[6] This would mean, it certainly seems, that if a party to the conflict holds an otherwise Protected Person in sites that it operates in third party states, that person would no longer be protected by the Convention. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 7:05 am
When a definition says “”includes”, it means that it can mean more than the terms that follow. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
And strangely, Part II-A of Professor Tillman’s brief devotes six pages to arguing (mistakenly) that “[i]n the Constitution of 1788, the President did not hold an ‘Office … under the United States,'” without arguing that the same is true in Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment—let alone that the alleged limited meaning of that phrase in 1788 is a reason for reversing the Colorado Supreme Court.) [read post]
