Search for: "Michael Miller"
Results 61 - 80
of 2,289
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
Paul Miller, founding partner at Miller/Wenhold Capitol Strategies, takes issue with tying lobbyists to the Menendez case, which centers on alleged bribery by businesspeople who are not registered lobbyists. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 5:20 am
Tech Policy Press writers Gabby Miller, Ben Lennett and Justin Hendrix recently wrote that ”rather than signaling a change in the tide, the lawsuits may ultimately spur a new round of bills that address flaws in those passed in the first wave. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
In Three Southern States, a Legal Battle Over Political Maps Yahoo News – Michael Wines (New York Times) | Published: 9/21/2023 The Republican-led Legislatures of Georgia, Louisiana, and Alabama find themselves backed against courtroom walls in similar circumstances, defending congressional maps that federal judges have said appear to discriminate against Black voters. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 6:05 am
Michael R. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 5:38 am
(It also depends on whether legislatures can rescind their ratifications, as some may have done; for more on that, see Michael Stokes Paulsen's General Theory of Article V.) [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
National/Federal AI Deepfakes in Campaigns May Be Detectable, But Will It Matter? [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 7:33 am
Michael Bogazis for his good work and professionalism over several years on this filing as well as Ms. [read post]
20 Aug 2023, 8:25 am
Miller and Brandon L. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 7:45 am
Michael Steele, a former chairman of the Republican National Committee, suggests that Never Trumpers coalesced around DeSantis too soon. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 3:25 am
Michael Winquist, who was aware of his stalking complaints. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 1:32 am
Michael D. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 10:41 pm
LexisNexis has selected some of the top “noteworthy” panel decisions issued by the California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board during the period January through June 2023. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 8:00 am
Miller and Robert S. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 4:31 am
Attorney Barbara McQuade, who published a model prosecution memo over a year ago on which we build.[14] Most recently, the consensus has been joined by Trump’s own former attorney general and one-time defender, Bill Barr,[15] and eminent conservative jurist Judge Michael Luttig.[16] A series of rare convictions of some of the leading insurrectionists under the charge of seditious conspiracy have now laid the groundwork for closely related insurrection charges against Trump. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm
Eddington (Senior Fellow, Cato Institute)“Lessons Learned and Caveats for the Future: The January 6, 2021, Attempted Insurrection”Expert Statement Mary Anne Franks (Professor of Law and Michael R. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 4:00 am
National/Federal How Judges Navigate Offers of Free Lunch, Trips and NBA Tickets Bloomberg Law – Zoe Tillman (Bloomberg News) | Published: 6/25/2023 Recent controversies over perks accepted by Supreme Court Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito have raised questions not only about the justices’ conduct off the bench and what they disclose to the public, but also about how the judiciary broadly enforces ethics. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 1:28 am
Shane Harris, Michael Birnbaum, Greg Miller, John Hudson, and Amy B Wang report for the Washington Post. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 11:41 am
For more, read “Dallas Fake Drug Cases Settle For Millions, Jury Awards Damages,” written by Michael Rigby and published by the Prison Legal News on March 15, 2006; “Ex-informant sentenced to 20 years in fake-drug scandal,” published in the Times Union on September 18, 2005; [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 7:09 pm
This bibliography comprises scholarly books, book chapters, and journal articles published or accepted for publication by full-time, emeritus, and retired faculty of the Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law between April 1, 2023 and June 30, 2023. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 5:50 am
Moritz, decided Mar. 31 by the Nebraska Supreme Court (in an opinion by Justice John Freudenberg, joined by Chief Justice Michael Heavican and Justices Stephanie Stacy and Jonathan Papik): At issue in this appeal is whether social media posts directed toward local public figures from a public account of an officer of a local bank constituted misconduct in connection with work disqualifying the employee from unemployment benefits. [read post]
