Search for: "Michael T. v. Commissioner of Correction "
Results 61 - 80
of 84
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2010, 9:05 pm
Dep’t of Corrections, No. 08-11722 (11th Cir 2010) Panel “denied habeas relief to a Florida inmate sentenced to death for the 1983 murder a sailor. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
After Commissioners’ Verbal Brawl, FEC Won’t Let Rep. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
" The Court's full text of the decision is set out below: Matter of Harkenrider v Hochul 2022 NY Slip Op 02833 Decided on April 27, 2022 Court of Appeals DiFiore, Ch. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
" The Court's full text of the decision is set out below: Matter of Harkenrider v Hochul 2022 NY Slip Op 02833 Decided on April 27, 2022 Court of Appeals DiFiore, Ch. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 3:25 am
Hutchison v. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 4:11 pm
On the same day there was a Pre-Trial Review in the case of Lewis v Commissioner of Police. [read post]
23 May 2008, 1:03 am
– Brdo: (IPR-Helpdesk), 5-6 June: USFDA public meeting on evaluation of product trade names: (FDA Law Blog), 9-12 June: (US) Strategies for management of IP – Chicago: (IPR-Helpdesk), 11 June: MARQUES ‘First meeting with Spanish Judges of the Community Trade Mark Courts’ – Alicante: (Class 46), 16 June / 1 July: US PLI: ‘Prior art & obviousness 2008: The PTO and CAFC perspective on patent law sections 102 & 103’ -… [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 12:31 am
A public hearing in the Tulisa Contostavlos v Michael Mendahun and others case took place last Monday and the order was continued. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 9:52 am
Dec. 357 (BIA 1996). 7 Matter of A-T, 24 I & N Dec. 275 (BIA 2007). 8 Bah v. [read post]
30 Jul 2023, 11:24 am
Mo. 1937) (prosecuting election commissioners that conspired to injure voters’ rights by counting certain votes for a different candidate); United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 5:01 am
" "The opinion is not a carte blanche invitation for judicial officers to assist all schools or all causes. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:00 am
Sondland Updates Impeachment Testimony, Describing Ukraine Quid Pro Quo MSN – Michael Schmidt (New York Times) | Published: 11/5/2019 A critical witness in the impeachment inquiry offered Congress substantial new testimony, revealing he told a top Ukrainian official that the country likely would not receive American military aid unless it publicly committed to investigations President Trump wanted. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am
Philadelphia Inquirer – Michael Brice-Saddler (Washington Post) | Published: 8/6/2019 The 44 names that U.S. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 5:05 pm
In a seminal discrimination case, Casteneda v. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court held in Kahler v. [read post]
28 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
Palin v. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 3:00 am
The 2010 SpeechNow v. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 8:17 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 4:14 am
As discussed here, in Public Employees’ Retirement System of Mississippi, v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:44 pm
Based on United Stat es Supreme Court decisions in Berman and Midkiff, it is probable that the Court will apply the more expansive interpretation of the public purpose clause to the federal Constitution. [read post]
