Search for: "Michael V O" Results 61 - 80 of 2,713
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2011, 2:42 am by SHG
But it doesn't concern crimlaw prof and Marquette dean Michael O'Hear, who readily acknowledges that his PrawfsBlawg post isn't likely to make his fellow scholars rip off clothes and dance in the hallways. [read post]
25 May 2015, 9:46 pm by Patent Docs
The Federal Circuit panel of judges Prost, Dyk, and O'Malley heard arguments, and affirmed the District Court. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 9:12 pm by Patent Docs
By Michael Borella -- When a district court judge states that "[o]ne could say this case is about a patent that claims too much and a legal test that provides too little," it is not hard to guess which way the case is going to go (the patent gets invalidated), based on what grounds (35 U.S.C. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 7:56 am by Dennis Crouch
Jason Rantanen's Patently-O post cited by District Court In Arlington Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 10:47 am by becassidy
According to A History of Digests, a recent article by Michael O. [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 7:43 am
Criminal Law Professor Michael O'Hear of Marquette Law School, famous for its "we don't teach nobody to be stinkin' lawyers" approach to education, provides a fascinating insight into how scholars go astray. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 3:05 pm
Konar-Steenberg (William Mitchell)Lyrissa Barnett Lidsky (Florida)Kevin Francis O'Neil (Cleveland State)Michael Stokes Paulsen (St. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 3:05 pm
Konar-Steenberg (William Mitchell)Lyrissa Barnett Lidsky (Florida)Kevin Francis O'Neil (Cleveland State)Michael Stokes Paulsen (St. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 9:07 am
[Rutgers Professor Michael Carrier recently posted as a guest at Patently-O arguing in favor of the FTC’s position in Rambus and the Supreme Court granting certiorari. [read post]