Search for: "Michael W. Murphy" Results 61 - 80 of 182
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Oct 2017, 7:16 am by Ronald Collins
And then this: “[W]e should not fail to be grateful for what America has given to us. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 11:49 am by Jack Sharman
North: Because the privilege against self-incrimination “reflects many of our fundamental values and most noble aspirations,” Murphy v. [read post]
16 May 2017, 8:37 am by Amira Mikhail, Russell Spivak
Michael Bennet (D-CO): If this is true, the president should explain to the American people why he divulged classified information to the Putin regime. [read post]
16 May 2017, 8:37 am by Amira Mikhail, Russell Spivak
Michael Bennet (D-CO): If this is true, the president should explain to the American people why he divulged classified information to the Putin regime. [read post]
4 May 2017, 6:48 am by Jamie Baker
Murphy’s article Judicial Deference, Agency Commitment and Force of Law was cited in the following comment: Richard W. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 1:22 pm
| Book review: "Brandfather: John Murphy, The Man Who Invented Branding" | IP Summit 2016 (Second Part) | Around the IP Blogs! [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 9:30 am by Jamie Baker
Camp Collecting Tax Liabilities From Third Parties, 152 TaxNotes 11, 1549 (2016) Gerry W. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 3:34 pm by Jamie Baker
Kathryn Sommerkamp’s article, Military Legal Practice Maxims: A Potpourri of Random Thoughts, was cited in the following article: Major Ian W. [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 7:50 pm by The Blog Team
United States, 430 U.S. 188 (1977), which held that  “[w]hen a fragmented Court decides a case and no single rationale explaining the result enjoys the assent of five Justices, the holding of the Court may be viewed as that position taken by those Members who concurred in the judgments on the narrowest grounds. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Strine, Criminal Justice and (a) Catholic Conscience, (Santa Clara Law Review, Vol. 56, 2016, Forthcoming).Michael W. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 4:13 am by Rebecca Tushnet
W/o harmonization, standards for advertising were different—protection very strict in Germany, 10-15% misled = sufficient for misleading. [read post]