Search for: "Michael v. United States"
Results 61 - 80
of 6,644
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Oct 2007, 8:38 am
Berman (Ohio State University - Michael E. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 3:37 pm
It was Ratified by the President of the United States of America on December 16, 1975. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 1:07 pm
Matthews, MD, PC v Harleysville Insurance Company, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan Southern Division, Case No. 18-11659, Hon. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 2:46 pm
State of Virginia v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 4:15 pm
The prosecutor relies on United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 9:31 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 12:30 pm
The case was United States v. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 5:30 am
We will be following the case of United States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 9:26 pm
Congratulations are in order for Licensed Physician's Assistant Saloumeh Rahbarvafaei and her defense attorneys, Federal Public Defenders Erin Murphy and Michael Driscoll, Jr. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:53 am
Last week, in Citizens United v. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 6:11 am
Dodge (state court tort suit) 8-13-19-first-amended-complaint.pdf Doucette v. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 11:29 am
Fair enough.But the United States decided to go further. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 1:17 pm
Michael Simon Design, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2017, 9:48 am
United States, decided on January 25, 2015, is also “the law of the land. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 9:23 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2005, 5:00 am
March 16, 2005), United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 10:24 pm
By Kelsey Clifford On September 7, 2021, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York dismissed an action brought by the Republic of Turkey (“Plaintiff”) against two defendants, billionaire Michael Steinhardt and Christie’s (“Defendants”), for the recovery of a millennia-old Antalonian Idol known as the “Guennol Stargazer” offered for sale by […] The post Case Review: Republic of Turkey v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 2:22 pm
The question in this case is whether Congress’s 2006 decision to reauthorize Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act under the pre-existing coverage formula of Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act exceeded its authority under the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments and thus violated the Tenth Amendment and Article IV of the United States Constitution.To discuss the case, we have Michael Carvin, who is a Partner at Jones Day.- See more at:… [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 2:22 pm
The question in this case is whether Congress’s 2006 decision to reauthorize Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act under the pre-existing coverage formula of Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act exceeded its authority under the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments and thus violated the Tenth Amendment and Article IV of the United States Constitution.To discuss the case, we have Michael Carvin, who is a Partner at Jones Day.- See more at:… [read post]
15 May 2017, 9:00 am
Section 6 of the executive order imposes, with exceptions, a 120-day suspension on both travel to the United States and decisions on applications for refugee status under the U.S. [read post]
