Search for: "Michelle Davis v. State"
Results 61 - 80
of 151
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2016, 4:30 am
Coverage of the four-four tie in United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 6:35 pm
Michigan and Davis v. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 4:09 pm
The Relationships between Speech and Conduct, UC Davis Law Review, Vol. 49, 2016, Arizona Legal Studies Discussion Paper No. 16-16, Jane R. [read post]
29 May 2016, 5:20 am
Yet, his decision in United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 9:18 am
Hathaway and Michelle Foster [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:43 am
Commentary on Horne v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 2:39 am
Commentary on Glossip v. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 4:09 am
Timothy Davis v. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 4:00 am
-Davis J. [read post]
28 Feb 2015, 6:32 pm
Michelle Rye v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 10:00 pm
Michelle Rye v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 10:00 pm
Michelle Rye v. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 3:57 am
” Gilligan, Will & Co. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2014, 12:39 pm
DavisStatutory speedy trial violationFailure to give lesser included offense instructionProsecutorial misconductImproper statements from state witnessesJanuary 30--Friday--a.m.State v. [read post]
29 Nov 2014, 11:10 am
(One for each dollar of his special assessment, on the sole reversed count).United States v. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 6:39 pm
– Chicago lawyer Kenneth Dolin of Seyfarth Shaw on the firm’s Employer Labor Relations Blog Waiting for Claim Assignment Doesn’t Toll Statute of Limitations: American Family v. [read post]
14 Jun 2014, 6:47 am
Davis won in State v. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 4:17 pm
Edge (brief); Michelle A. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 1:31 pm
In this presentation, Mills will describe how he came to represent a woman named Michelle Ortiz, who was sexually assaulted by a jail guard, won a jury verdict against state officials under the federal civil-rights statute (42 U.S.C. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 8:45 am
In this presentation, Mills will describe how he came to represent a woman named Michelle Ortiz, who was sexually assaulted by a jail guard, won a jury verdict against state officials under the federal civil-rights statute (42 U.S.C. [read post]
