Search for: "Mickey v. Mickey " Results 61 - 80 of 174
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Oct 2023, 2:26 am by INFORRM
 In Re D [2008] 1 WLR 1499 at [27] Lord Carswell approved what had been said by Richards LJ in R (N) v Mental Health Review Tribunal (Northern Region) [2006] QB 468 at [62] who had said, ‘Although there is a single civil ;standard of proof on the balance of probabilities, it is flexible in its application. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 7:42 pm by richbailey
Supreme Court began hearing arguments Wednesday in Golan v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 1:23 pm by Maysa Razavi
 Characters are also covered by the copyright of the film (See MGM v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 7:47 am by Robert Laplaca
  In March, she appeared in a fashion spread in V Magazine as “The Face of New Age Logomania. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 12:22 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Liberty is not “I do what I want”; grown up understanding is ordered liberty, reconciling competing claims/rights, and that’s what property/copyright does.Palmer: Rivalrous v. nonrivalrous: good reason to have property, because it avoids conflict over rivalry. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 9:02 am by Ernie Svenson
One example is Disney and its famous character, Mickey Mouse. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 3:30 am by Walter Olson
[cross-posted and expanded with a P.S. from Cato at Liberty] Even by his standards, Paul Krugman uses remarkably ugly and truculent language in challenging the good faith of those who take a view opposed to his on the case of King v. [read post]
25 Dec 2008, 11:56 am
  The December 22, 2008,  decision does not provide many human interest details about the case, other than to note that two men, Oren Adar and Mickey Ray Smith, jointly adopted the child in New York and currently live in San Diego. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 8:57 pm
(Image from www.moviewallpapers.net posted by Mickey Glitter at [www.flickr.com]; license details at both sites.) [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 3:53 pm by Ron Coleman
It is tailor-made to ensure that public figures do not have to be worried about New York Times v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 7:12 am by Marissa Miller
    In association with Bloomberg Law [read post]
1 Sep 2013, 5:09 pm by INFORRM
  The High Court recently adopted such an approach in AAA v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2012] EWHC 2103 (QB). [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 1:15 am by Aaron Moss
The principle that characters which evolve over time don’t enter the public domain all at once was established by the 2014 opinion in Klinger v. [read post]