Search for: "Miller v. Board of Supervisors" Results 61 - 80 of 127
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The Past Year In CEQA Case Law: A Quick Look Back at 2017
8 Jan 2018, 4:31 pm by Arthur F. Coon
Kern County Board of Supervisors (2017) 17 Cal.App.5th 708, also addressed important CEQA baseline and railroad operation preemption issues. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
First District Holds Sonoma County Vineyard Development (VESCO) Permit was Ministerial Approval Exempt from CEQA
24 Apr 2017, 2:32 pm by Arthur F. Coon
Napa County board of Supervisors (2012) 205 Cal.App.4th 162, 178), the Court stated it would review an agency’s related factual determinations for substantial evidence and pure questions of law de novo. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Supreme Court Set To Hear Important CEQA Subsequent Review Case
26 Apr 2016, 1:46 pm by Arthur F. Coon
Board of Supervisors (1991) 226 Cal.App.3d 1467.) [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Sixth District Affirms Judgment Dismissing CEQA Action For Failure To Timely Join Indispensable Real Party Within Limitations Period Triggered By Filing of Second, Valid NOD; Court Rejects Plaintiff’s Arguments Based On Relation Back, Estoppel, and City’s Violation of Statute Requiring It To Mail Operative NOD
1 Jun 2021, 8:52 am by Arthur F. Coon
Board of Supervisors (1984) 158 Cal.App.3d 1072, 1081.) [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Supreme Engagement: CEQA’s Continuing Saga In California’s High Court
5 Jan 2016, 3:53 pm by Arthur F. Coon
Santa Clara County Bd. of Supervisors (2010) 48 Cal.4th 32. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
“Sauce For The Gander”: Second District Holds CEQA’s Broad Definition Of “Project” Also Applies In Determining Scope of Activity To Which Statutory Exemption Applies
19 Jun 2018, 2:29 pm by Arthur F. Coon
Board of Supervisors (1972) 8 Cal.3d 247, 259.) [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Third District Reverses Order Prematurely Discharging CEQA Writ for Failure to Address Objections That Certified Revised EIR Was Still Noncompliant, Holds Project Opponents Could Properly Opt to Raise Challenge Through Objections to Return Without Filing Separate Action
23 May 2024, 4:54 pm by Arthur F. Coon
Board of Supervisors (1982) 137 Cal.App.3d 964, 971; County of Inyo v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
The Week That Will Be
17 Dec 2018, 8:47 am by William Ford
Aaron David Miller will moderate the discussion. [read post]
Lawfare - http://www.lawfareblog.com/
Judge Kavanaugh on work law
16 Aug 2018, 9:06 am by Charlotte Garden
Kavanaugh wrote for a unanimous court, vacating board decisions in both Southern New England Telephone Co. v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
Brett Kavanaugh’s Supreme Court Job Interview: An Employer’s Perspective
25 Jul 2018, 11:05 am by Jessica Perry
In Miller v. [read post]
Employment Law and Litigation - http://blogs.orrick.com/employment/
Out With The Old (And In With The New … Next Year)! – Third District Rejects CEQA And General Plan Consistency Challenges to Sacramento’s 2035 General Plan Update And Related EIR, Holds Traffic Analysis Challenge Based On Lowering of Acceptable LOS Is Mooted By Public Resources Code § 20199, But New VMT Standard Doesn’t Yet Apply
23 Dec 2019, 1:36 pm by Arthur F. Coon
Board of Supervisors (1981) 126 Cal.App.3d 698, 702-703, 708.) [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Slapping Down An Anti-SLAPP: First District Holds Next-Door Neighbor Opponents Of Residential Renovation Project And Related CEQA Compliance In City’s Administrative Proceedings Were Properly Named As Real Parties In Interest In Project Proponent’s Subsequent Mandate Action Challenging City’s Project Denial
12 May 2023, 4:57 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  Christopher Durkin v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
NLRB Law Memo 10/18/2006
18 Oct 2006, 5:26 pm
On Sept. 29, 2006, the Board issued its decisions in Oakwood Healthcare, Croft Metals, and Golden Crest, in light of the Supreme Court's decision in NLRB v. [read post]
NLRB Law Memo - http://www.lawmemo.com/nlrb/memo/
NLRB Law Memo 10/09/2006
9 Oct 2006, 5:12 pm
Member Schaumber also found it unnecessary to pass on these unfair labor practices found by his colleagues: Supervisor Margeret Johnson's alleged coercive interrogation and threat of job loss of employees Mullanix-Ackerman and Williams; Supervisor Denise Miller's alleged coercive interrogation of Mullanix-Ackerman; and Barroso's threatening employees with unspecified reprisals. [read post]
NLRB Law Memo - http://www.lawmemo.com/nlrb/memo/
Are Courts Actively Limiting CEQA’s Scope In The Absence of Meaningful Legislative Reform?
31 Aug 2012, 10:22 am by Arthur F. Coon
Napa County Board of Supervisors (2012) 205 Cal.App.4th 162 (holding Napa County’s revised lot line adjustment ordinance properly classified lot line adjustment decisions consistent with the Map Act’s exemption as ministerial in nature and exempt from CEQA); Friends of Juana Briones House v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
First District Affirms Judgment Rejecting CEQA and General Plan Consistency Challenges to Napa County’s EIR for Syar Quarry Expansion Project, Addresses Significant Exhaustion and Land Use Issues
3 May 2021, 9:58 am by Arthur F. Coon
  Stop Syar Expansion v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
“Yes, San Francisco, There Is A CEQA”: First District Reverses Judgment Upholding City’s Categorical Exemption Determinations For Project To Add Four 90-Foot Tall Light Standards To High School Stadium In Residential Neighborhood
7 Dec 2022, 4:07 pm by Arthur F. Coon
The City’s Board of Supervisors approved the school’s nighttime lighting project with numerous conditions and affirmed the planning department’s determination that it was categorically exempt from CEQA under the Guidelines’ class 1 (existing facilities) and class 3 (small structures) categorical exemptions. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Reversal of Misfortune: Second District Holds CEQA Action Challenging Los Angeles Housing Development Project Barred By Statute of Limitations, Reverses Trial Court Judgment Rejecting MND and Requiring EIR
29 Jan 2024, 8:41 am by Arthur F. Coon
  (Citing 7 Miller & Starr, Cal. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Fifth District Holds Issue Exhaustion Not Required Where Agency Gave No Notice of Intent To Rely On CEQA Exemption Prior to Hearing, And Existing Facilities Categorical Exemption Does Not Apply to Unlined Landfills As A Matter of Law
23 Aug 2021, 4:42 pm by Arielle Harris and Arthur F. Coon
The County Board of Supervisors (“Board”) held a public hearing on August 15, 2017 to consider approval of the required resolutions of necessity. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
‘Good guy’ employers still get sued
10 Mar 2016, 9:29 am by Lorene Park
Baldwin County Board of Education). [read post]
WKL&B WOrkDay Blog - http://www.employmentlawdaily.com/index.php/blog