Search for: "Monroe v. State Bar" Results 61 - 80 of 145
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Dec 2014, 6:31 pm by Brian Shiffrin
Similarly, the New York State Bar Association (NYSBA) recommends that indigent individuals be afforded "early entry of representation" whenever counsel is requested for an indigent party under investigation or in custody (see NYSBA Revised Standards for Providing Mandated Representation, standard B-1 at 5 [2010], available at https://www.ils.ny.gov/files/Revised%20Standards%20For%20Providing%20 Mandated%20Representation.pdf). [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 5:00 am
A corporation is domiciled only in the state where it is incorporated (Sease v Central Greyhound Lines, Inc., of New York, 306 NY 284 [1954]). [read post]
We note that our initial discussion regarding whether the plaintiffs stated a cause of action to recover damages for inverse condemnation is necessary notwithstanding our holding that said cause of action is time-barred, inasmuch as those two issues are inextricably linked. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 7:26 am by Brian Shiffrin
The Monroe County District Attorney, in its Respondent's brief contended that the appeal had to be dismissed because Dizak failed to serve his notice of appeal in a timely manner. [read post]
13 Dec 2024, 5:00 am
Such service was not in accordance with the mandates of the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure, which requires service on in-state defendants by a Sheriff’s Department. [read post]
30 Dec 2024, 5:00 am
Plaintiff Must Answer Questions at IME or DMEIn the Monroe County case of Nelson v. [read post]
15 Feb 2009, 8:54 am
  Another example can be found in the dissenting opinion of Balla v. [read post]
12 Jul 2014, 12:27 pm
 I was perfectly content with my life until Jeremy suggested that I blog about the United States Patent and Trademark Office (TTAB) Harry Winston v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:04 pm by Roshonda Scipio
Simon.Stahl, Philip Michael.Chicago, Illinois : ABA Section of Family Law, [2013]KF547 .S733 2013 Family Law According to our hearts : Rhinelander v. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 9:11 am by South Florida Lawyers
But the judge is not done:  In my view, to affirm what happened here requires that we turn a blind eye to the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, the Florida Bar Rules of Professional Conduct, and the Code of Judicial Conduct, to say nothing of the Constitutions of the United States and the State of Florida.Ok, but no traffic safety rules were violated, so it's not all bad. [read post]