Search for: "Moore v. Council" Results 61 - 80 of 286
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Sep 2020, 8:56 am by Dani Selby
Payne has an intellectual disability and that he meets all of the criteria for intellectual disability under Atkins v. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
This project, funded by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada for seven years beginning in 2011, brought together leading researchers and policy makers from Canada and around the world to examine various aspects of the current access to justice crisis in civil and family law, focusing in particular on cost and affordability. [read post]
The Court, thus, concluded that the adoption and amendment of statewide rules governing inverse condemnation statutes should be left to the Legislature or Judicial Council. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 4:01 am by Guest Blogger
” The Council responded by holding an urgent debate on 17th and 18th June. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
On May 21st a Federal Court justice delivered a decision in the case Smith v. [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 4:12 pm by INFORRM
IPSO has published one ruling since our last Round Up: 05869-19 Begum V The Daily Mirror, 1 Accuracy (2018), 2 Privacy (2018), 6 Children (2018), Breach- sanction: publication of correction Recent Judgments On 8 April 2020 Warby J handed down judgment in Birmingham City Council v Afsar (No.4) [2020] EWHC 864 (QB). [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 8:43 pm by Chris Castle
[This is a version of a letter I sent to the Senate Subcommittee on Intellectual Property today to call attention to various discrepancies in the proposed witness list, especially the presence of the Pirate Party at a hearing at the world’s greatest deliberative body. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 12:55 pm by Gordon Ahl, William Ford
Alexander Vindman, the director for European affairs at the National Security Council. [read post]
17 Aug 2019, 5:06 am by Vishnu Kannan
Scott Moore argued that President Trump’s techno-nationalism is a mistake. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal Campaigns Say They’ll Match Political Contributions. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 8:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
Supreme Court’s decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
Not only does this strategy undermine our commitment to a right of access to the courts, and ignore the Supreme Court of Canada’s clear statement in Pintea v John that SRLs cannot and should not be treated the same way as expert counsel, but by punishing SRLs for their unintended mistakes with vexatious litigant and court restriction orders, this strategy is also making the public angrier and even more indignant at their treatment in Canada’s Access to Justice crisis. [read post]