Search for: "Moore v. Harris"
Results 61 - 80
of 227
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jan 2019, 3:19 pm
This movie has played on the Supreme Court Channel more times than the Harry Potter movies have played on cable TV.In Shoop v. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 11:52 am
Coleman served as co-counsel with Thurgood Marshall in Brown v. [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 9:56 am
Harris Funeral Homes, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 2:13 pm
Note to our Right on Crime friends: We need to see Bernie Kerik v. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 8:46 am
In Hurst v. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 10:42 am
Pink (1942), Dames & Moore v. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 7:04 am
Carlton & Harris Chiropractic Inc., 17-1705 Issues: (1) Whether the Hobbs Act strips courts of jurisdiction to engage in a traditional Chevron analysis and requires [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 11:28 am
Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit properly used Moore v. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 2:40 pm
Harris, 43 N.C. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 10:53 am
Burwell (2012), U.S. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 10:47 am
The last Democrat who could potentially vote to confirm Kavanaugh is Doug Jones of Alabama, who upset Roy Moore in a special election last year. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 4:00 am
MOORE, Assistant Counsel, Buffalo Public School District (Allison B. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 10:11 am
Keri Blakinger of the Houston Chronicle reports that, in a 5-3 decision, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals held that Moore "had failed to show adaptive deficits sufficient to support a diagnosis of intellectual disability" Acknowledging the guidance the Supreme Court provided in Moore v. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 5:52 am
Harris Funeral Homes, Inc., March 7, 2018, Moore, K.). [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 5:50 am
Samuels v. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 9:00 am
In a puzzling turn that EO-3’s challengers need to address at the Supreme Court, the INA argument only got five votes on the Fourth Circuit (Judges Gregory, Wynn, Harris, Diaz, and Thacker), while three generally liberal judges (Harris, Motz, and King) joined the majority on the constitutional issue but felt that the statutory issue was too complex to resolve. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 9:00 am
In a puzzling turn that EO-3’s challengers need to address at the Supreme Court, the INA argument only got five votes on the Fourth Circuit (Judges Gregory, Wynn, Harris, Diaz, and Thacker), while three generally liberal judges (Harris, Motz, and King) joined the majority on the constitutional issue but felt that the statutory issue was too complex to resolve. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 9:00 am
In a puzzling turn that EO-3’s challengers need to address at the Supreme Court, the INA argument only got five votes on the Fourth Circuit (Judges Gregory, Wynn, Harris, Diaz, and Thacker), while three generally liberal judges (Harris, Motz, and King) joined the majority on the constitutional issue but felt that the statutory issue was too complex to resolve. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 6:24 am
Moore, 46 N.C. [read post]
