Search for: "Morales v. Social Security Administration" Results 61 - 80 of 315
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Sep 2013, 10:04 am by Mark Zamora
That the plaintiff, by reason of age, infirmity, or otherwise, is now or may be entitled in the future to receive any compensation or benefits by reason of the Social Security Law of the United States or from any governmental agency such as the veterans' Administration, Medicare, or sources of this nature.5. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 8:38 am by Cecillia Wang
His department will play a critical role, along with the Department of Homeland Security, in repairing the damage caused by the Trump administration. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 4:04 am by Edith Roberts
Bush administration in lawsuits over terrorism policies and interrogation of detainees. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 2:10 pm
Postal Service (which employed one of the plaintiffs), Social Security Administrator Michael J. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 7:37 am by Andrew Koppelman
- elderly retirees who do not have the Social Security benefits they would have received if their spouse were of the opposite sex [read post]
7 May 2012, 3:05 am by New Books Script
Toronto, Ont. : Continuing Professional Development, Law Society of Upper Canada, 2012 1 v. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm by Leslie C. Griffin
The administration expanded the exemption, making it available to many more religious and purportedly moral employers. [read post]
26 May 2011, 9:23 am by Alicia Feichtmeir
There is an exemption for specific employee records, including “personally identifiable information” such as addresses, phone numbers and social security numbers. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 4:14 am by Emma Snell
” His comments come as nationwide protests sparked by the death of 22-year-old Mahsa Amini in the custody of Iran’s morality police entered a third week. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 6:41 am
After much national and international uproar at these blatant violations of human rights, the Supreme Court finally ruled five to three in Hamdan v. [read post]
16 May 2023, 6:30 am by Sabina Henneberg
Saied remains a deeply polarizing figure who has taken advantage of existing political and social divisions to incapacitate his opponents. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
R (on the application of Zagorski and Baze) v Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills and Archimedes Pharma UK Ltd – read judgment The Administrative Court has put down a marker on the potential applicability of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights about the morality of certain trade with the United States. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 5:35 am by JB
Aiello and Personnel Administrator of Massachusetts v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 9:25 am by Larry Catá Backer
By citing this Article, the 1957 Regulation implies that the administrative apparatus may forcefully deprive a citizen’ personal freedom for the purpose of enforce work discipline or promote social ethics, even when the given individual is without any criminal liability or has committed minor offense that does not amount to incarceration under the criminal code. [read post]