Search for: "Mosley v. Doe"
Results 61 - 80
of 223
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Dec 2016, 4:44 pm
The last of these was R v France (Anthony) [2016] EWCA Crim 1588 (Case summary: [2016] WLR (D) 566.) [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 8:00 am
” Commonwealth v. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 6:01 am
Mosley also let appellant use her cell phone at the same time. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 7:13 am
The well known case of Mosley v NGN [2008] EWHC 1777 (QB) confirms that there is a reasonable expectation of privacy in sexual activity with prostitutes. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 4:05 pm
In truth, the PJS story in itself does not matter. [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 4:07 pm
I agree – if Kennedy and Sullivan are anything to go by, the levels are not very high (especially by comparison with damages for defamation; see Mosley v News Group Newspapers [2008] EWHC 1777 (QB) (24 July 2008) [212] (Eady J); though note also Representative Claimants v MGN Ltd [2016] 2 WLR 1217, [2015] EWCA Civ 1291 (17 December 2015)). [read post]
26 May 2016, 4:30 am
On 19 May 2016, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in PJS v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2016] UKSC 26. [read post]
24 May 2016, 5:32 am
See, Internet justice: Mosley v Google. [read post]
22 May 2016, 4:00 am
The secret threesome celebrities deserve protection | Max Mosley https://t.co/XysaQcjOSg -> “Free speech drowning”? [read post]
23 Apr 2016, 4:30 pm
Estonia and MTE v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 7:12 am
The court reviewed certain authorities that have grappled with this problem, including: McKennit v Ash [2005] EWHC 3003 (see [81]); Rocknroll v Newsgroup Newspapers Ltd [2013] EWHC 24 (see [21] and [25]); and Mosley v Newsgroup Newspapers Ltd [2008] EWHC 687, where Eady J observed: “Nevertheless, a point may be reached where the information sought to be restricted, by order of the Court is so widely and generally accessible ‘in the public… [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 5:00 am
Estonia and MTE v. [read post]
13 Mar 2016, 5:05 pm
They argue that the bill does not provide adequate safeguards for journalists and their sources from state surveillance. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 12:45 am
In Galloway v William Frederick Frazer, Google Inc t/a YouTube and others, Mr Justice Horner in the High Court of Northern Ireland refused an application by Google Inc. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 12:50 am
The Mosley case followed earlier High Court battles that saw the courts establish the balancing exercise between Article 10 and Article 8, in particular the House of Lords decision in Campbell v MGN ([2004] 2 AC 457). [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 4:16 pm
New ruling says bosses can monitor private communications – or does it? [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 4:08 pm
Part 1 – Adrienne Page QC Case Law: OPO v James Rhodes (formerly MLA): Pianist’s book unbanned, no intention to cause distress – Dan Tench Case Law: Mosley v Google Inc, Data Protection claim against Google to go to trial – Lorna Skinner Privacy Issues in New Zealand: Sex with the Office Lights on – Nicole Moreham Case Law: Vidal-Hall v Google, Distress damages can be awarded under s 13 DPA without pecuniary loss (and misuse of… [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 3:46 am
The respondents pointed out that in AAA v Associated Newspapers and Weller v Associated Newspapers; children have been awarded damages despite being oblivious to their privacy rights being violated. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 11:52 am
” Hill v. [read post]
18 Oct 2015, 9:32 am
The decision was, nevertheless, controversial as the all the claimants were awarded more than the previous highest damages in a privacy case (the £60,000 paid to Max Mosley in 2008. [read post]
