Search for: "Mrs. Lilly"
Results 61 - 80
of 277
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jan 2018, 12:47 pm
Mr. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 11:11 am
X ZR 29/15, GRUR 2016/921 (Eli Lilly v Actavis), paras. 83-85). [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 3:10 pm
Expectation of success argued Lilly, was a "critical consideration in all "obvious to try" cases. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 4:05 pm
Mr Speker cites the case of Economou v de Freitas, about which – as the trial judge – I should make no comment. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 6:09 pm
Mr Welch agreed, observing that a refusal to grant injunctions would mean that the incentives for patentees would be reduced. [read post]
23 Aug 2017, 10:28 am
Below is our quarterly update which went out via email today to our firm’s clients and friends. **** August 23, 2017 Clients, Friends, Associates: We hope you are enjoying the summer. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 8:43 am
The event will now take place at:UCL Institute of Education (Logan Hall)20 Bedford WayBloomsburyLondon WC1H 0ALPhoto courtesy of Mr. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 5:56 am
UK Supreme Court moves towards a UK Doctrine of Equivalents in Lilly pemetrexed battle? [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 3:14 am
While in Italy a formal exception to copyright on freedom of panorama does not exist, Mr. [read post]
15 Jul 2017, 5:11 am
BREAKING: Eli Lilly success as UK Supreme Court finds Actavis products directly and indirectly infringe pemetrexed patentThe on-going saga between Eli Lilly and Actavis regarding Lilly's pemetrexed disodium product has kept the English courts busy for years. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 6:00 am
Eli Lilly & Co v Actavis UK Ltd & Ors, heard 4-6 Apr 2017. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 8:47 am
In a decision dated 11 January 2017, the French Supreme Court settled a dispute between the recording company Heben Music and Mr X, the author of two songs commercialised under the name of a cartoon-character known as “Baby Lilly” (“Bébé Lilly” in French). [read post]
31 May 2017, 8:28 am
Lilly [2015] EWHC 3294 (Pat) ruled should not be equated with "plausibility. [read post]
16 May 2017, 2:55 am
A General Civil Restraint Order (GCRO) was recently granted by HHJ Hacon in the latest of the long running series of disputes between Perry v FH Brundle and others [2017] EWHC 678 concerning Mr Perry's allegations of patent infringement and related actions for unjustified threats of patent infringement. [read post]
9 May 2017, 12:59 pm
An AIPPI Rapid Response Event I WIPO's statistics for 2016: Asia continues to roar I UK UPC ratification still on track despite Article 50 trigger I Does Mr Justice Arnold's decision in Teva v MSD show just how large a role patent law has come to play in assessing SPC validity? [read post]
8 May 2017, 10:17 am
Not so fast…“It is a challenge to ever know what a judgment really means, especially one as long as Mr Justice Birss' latest decision in Unwired Planet v Huawei [2017] EWHC 711. [read post]
1 May 2017, 11:36 am
Oh, and by the way, Eli Lilly was now seeking damages in the amount of $500,000,000. [read post]
1 May 2017, 11:36 am
Oh, and by the way, Eli Lilly was now seeking damages in the amount of $500,000,000. [read post]
30 Apr 2017, 4:30 am
An AIPPI Rapid Response Event | UK UPC ratification still on track despite Article 50 trigger | Does Mr Justice Arnold's decision in Teva v MSD show just how large a role patent law has come to play in assessing SPC validity? [read post]
15 Apr 2017, 4:17 am
Tune in LIVE for tomorrow's Eli Lilly v Actavis Supreme Court showdownThe Supreme Court was live online to hear Tom Mitcheson QC (supported by Andrew Waugh QC and leading Stuart Baran) for Eli Lilly against Danny Alexander QC (leading Thomas Raphael QC) for Actavis.Oldie but goldie - when is old prior art a suitable starting point for inventive step analysis? [read post]
