Search for: "Mummery"
Results 61 - 80
of 100
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2011, 10:12 am
Late last month the Court of Appeal for England and Wales (Lord Justice Mummery, Lady Justice Black and Sir John Chadwick) agreed that the appeal should be dismissed. [read post]
24 May 2011, 7:32 am
She also did not accept any of the husband's arguments as to the quantum of the periodical payments orders, including an argument that the judge had failed to make proper allowance for the contribution that the wife's new partner should be making to her household.Accordingly, the appeal was dismissed.Lewison J and Mummery LJ gave concurring judgments. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 1:00 am
” At the same time – and apparently as part of the same phenomenon of the unease of the unChurched meddling in matters religious of which they knew little and cared less – a line of case law developed which denied ministers of religion access to any private law contractual remedies against the religious bodies employing their services, on the basis that any contract was made not with their specific religious institution but with the God they served, and hence not enforceable before… [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 7:30 pm
On the same day Mummery LJ heard renewed applications for permission to appeal in the case of Berezovky v Terluk. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 1:30 am
Hamblen J at first instance concluded that the answers were “yes” and “no” respectively; the Court of Appeal (Richards LJ, with whom Mummery and Rimer LJJ agreed) came to the opposite conclusions. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 10:59 pm
Previous Conditions Lady Justice Smith and Lord Justice Mummery both considered whether the conditions in which the person concerned had lived previously were relevant. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 9:44 pm
The primary concern raised by Lord Justice Mummery is the problem of a “fail-safe” class, a common obstacle to class certification in the U.S. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 4:38 pm
Berezovsky -v- Vladimir Terluk & anr heard 9 November 2010 (Mummery and Sedley LJJ) Cambridge v Makin, heard 8 to 12 November 2010 (Tugendhat J) Pritchard Englefield & anr v Steinberg heard 19 November 2010 (Eady J) [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 3:16 pm
Mummery LJ and Aikens LJ agreed that the effect of the Prudential decision was to render the agreement void. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 3:16 pm
Mummery LJ and Aikens LJ agreed that the effect of the Prudential decision was to render the agreement void. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 7:31 pm
Mark v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2002] EMLR 38 – Simon Brown LJ gave the leading judgment, Mummery and Dyson LJJ agreed in this libel case in which the Court of Appeal allowed an appeal by the Blair’s former nanny against a judgment striking out her pleading meanings. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 7:24 am
The same analysis was applied by Elias LJ and Mummery LJ in the Court of Appeal. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 12:42 am
Lord Justice Mummery said that decent law-abiding citizens would find the unanimous ruling “incomprehensible” but, on the basis of legal arguments, Alan Beesley’s appeal had to be allowed. [read post]
29 Aug 2009, 12:53 am
Mummery LJ added nothing of substance but dealt with a minor procedural matter. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 6:16 am
Judgment Stanley Burton LJ, with whom Lloyd and Mummery LJJ agreed, proceeded first on an “apart from authority” basis ([26]-[32]). [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 11:32 am
Mummery LJ's careful analysis, ... reaching this conclusion and for setting aside the second and third declarations made by Blackburne J, seems to me to be encapsulated in the following two propositions. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 2:51 am
Yesterday, at [2009] EWCA Civ 750, the Court of Appeal (Lords Justices Mummery, Lloyd and Moore-Bick) dismissed the appeal against the trial judge's decision. [read post]
21 Mar 2009, 8:48 am
The Court of Appeal in Mummery LJ’s sole judgment, found the Recorder’s judgment difficult to appeal - the court of appeal should not interfere with the exercise of discretion simply because another decision could also be reached on the same facts. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 2:28 am
Lord Justice Mummery commented that if it were otherwise, there would be a striking disparity between the treatment of the two types of creditors, which could not be justified by the language of the clause or the general purpose of the CVA. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 1:22 am
The final will be judged by Lords Justice Mummery and Jacob, and Mr Justice Floyd, and will take place at 2.30pm on Saturday 21 March. [read post]
