Search for: "Murphy v. Cole"
Results 61 - 80
of 152
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2011, 12:21 pm
(C.D.Cal. 2008) 249 F.R.D. 580, 585 (Brown), quoting Murphy v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 10:44 am
In that sense, the opinion reminds me of Murphy v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 2:43 pm
Lazarus; responses by Keith Cole, Mary D. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 3:42 pm
The thrust of the argument in opposition is that Section 226.7 premium wages should be governed by Section 1194, not only because Section 226.7 proscribes a statutorily mandated wage, but also because the California Supreme Court concluded in Murphy v. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 9:18 am
The answer to both questions is no.A few years ago, when we were all waiting for a decision in Murphy v. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 2:01 pm
Murphy v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 5:00 am
’ ” (Murphy v. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 8:50 am
” See Murphy v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 1:32 pm
” (Murphy v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 9:29 pm
Men have it easy compared to women: they don’t have to ponder the great Pantsuit v. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 10:14 pm
There is quite a bit to absorb in Jaimez v. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 4:27 pm
In Murphy v. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 7:19 am
(See, e.g., the Murphy v. [read post]
6 May 2009, 5:49 pm
The ruling in Murphy v. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 8:52 am
In Naranjo v. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
Richard Bagdasarian, Inc. 2008 WL 888524, one of the penalty/wage cases that was a companion case to Murphy v Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc. (2007) 40 C4th 1094, and checked to see if it was still pending. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 3:47 pm
Superior Court (Kimco) (2007) 157 Cal.App.4th 225 (review denied), the Third Division disregarded a discussion in Murphy v. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 11:09 pm
Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc. (2007) 40 Cal.4th 1094]. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 9:31 pm
Court" and then published this analysis: REST BREAK AND MEAL PERIOD CLAIMS AFTER MURPHY V. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 10:21 am
To my knowledge this specific issue has not been address since Murphy v. [read post]