Search for: "Murphy v. IRS" Results 61 - 80 of 149
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2022, 2:05 pm by INFORRM
Free speech rights in the Irish Constitution 2.1 The freedom of political expression The right “to express freely … convictions and opinions” contained in Article 40.6.1(i) of the Constitution is now understood, broadly speaking, as a freedom of political expression, concerned with the public activities of citizens in a democratic society (see Murphy v Irish Radio and Television Commission [1999] 1 IR 12, 24, [1998] 2 ILRM 360, 372, (28 May… [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 8:43 pm by Benjamin Beaton
  Murphy’s (first) Law — Jurisdiction is often the first topic encountered by law students; fittingly, Judge Eric Murphy confronted it in his first published opinion as a Sixth Circuit judge–In re Capital Contracting Company. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 1:33 pm by Gail Cecchettini Whaley
” In 2007, the California Supreme Court held that the hour of additional pay for missed meal or rest breaks is not a penalty but a premium wage that compensates employees (Murphy v. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
The first was Murphy v. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 8:43 pm by Benjamin Beaton and Lauren Kuley
  Murphy’s (first) Law — Jurisdiction is often the first topic encountered by law students; fittingly, Judge Eric Murphy confronted it in his first published opinion as a Sixth Circuit judge–In re Capital Contracting Company. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
”, Murphy J ignored the 2010 Act entirely, began his analysis with Bonnard v Perryman, discussed subsequent authorities, and declined to award the injunction. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 11:10 am
The following is a synopsis of a recent seminal tax case involving damages in a whistle blower case: Murphy v IRS In a Department of Labor ruling in the whistle blower case of Marita Murphy it was held that Ms. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 11:59 pm
Challenges have been brought in both jurisdictions - in Ireland, it was Colgan v IRTC [2000] 2 IR 490. [read post]
25 May 2012, 5:23 pm by INFORRM
As to the first, no privilege arose on the facts; and, even if one did, the interests of justice required that it be precluded (Smurfit Paribas Bank Ltd v AAB Export Finance Ltd [1990] 1 IR 469 (SC); Murphy v Kirwan [1993] 3 IR 501 (SC); Miley v Flood [2001] 1 ILRM 489, [2001] 2 IR 50, [2001] IEHC 9 (24 January 2001); Fyffes v DCC [2005] 1 IR 59 (SC), [2005] IESC 3 (27 January 2005) applied). [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 5:58 am by Bernard Bell
& RICHARD MURPHY, 1 ADMINISTRATIVE LAW AND PRACTICE §3.13 (3d ed. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 1:11 pm
  The case of  Murphy v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 6:52 am by INFORRM
A good example of this is to be found in the judgment of O’Hanlon J in MM v Drury [1994] 2 IR 8. [read post]