Search for: "Murphy v. Kenneth Cole Productions"
Results 61 - 80
of 80
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2007, 10:35 am
Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc., 40 Cal.4th 1094 (2007), White v. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 2:04 pm
Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc., supra, 40 Cal.4th at pp. 1108-1109.) [read post]
23 Jul 2008, 6:38 am
Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc. (2007) 40 Cal.4th 1094, 1105, 1113 (Murphy).) [read post]
22 Jul 2007, 10:48 pm
Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc. [read post]
4 May 2012, 11:51 am
Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc., 40 Cal. 4th 1094 (2007). [read post]
2 May 2012, 8:41 am
See Murphy v. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 11:09 pm
Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc. (2007) 40 Cal.4th 1094]. [read post]
6 May 2008, 6:00 am
Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc. (2007) 40 Cal.4th 1094, 1116 (Murphy).) [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 10:14 pm
There is quite a bit to absorb in Jaimez v. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 10:55 am
By Jim Butler, Hotel Lawyer | Author of www.HotelLawBlog.com 17 April 2007 Hotel Lawyer with landmark labor and employment decision from the California Supreme Court on wage and hour issues. [read post]
Employees Cannot Obtain “Double Recovery” of Unpaid Wages and Premiums for Non-Compliant Rest Breaks
26 Oct 2020, 3:24 pm
Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc., 40 Cal.4th 1094 (2007)), and relied on the revised piece-rate statute, Section 226.2, which became effective in 2016. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 5:53 am
In Murphy v. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 1:30 pm
[Murphy v Kenneth Cole Productions, 40 Cal.4th 1094 (2007)], but in certain cases, a 1 year filing deadline could apply. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 11:59 am
Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc., 20 Cal. 4th 1094, 1118 (2007). [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 2:03 pm
Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 8:38 pm
Kenneth Cole Productions. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 4:11 pm
Kenneth Cole Productions, in which the court held that the penalties recoverable under Labor Code section 226.7 for meal or rest period violations are "a 'wage' for purposes of determining what statute of limitations applies to section 226.7 claims. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 1:32 pm
Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc. (2007) 40 Cal.4th 1094, 1103.) [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 6:44 am
Kenneth Cole Products, Inc., which held that “the section 226.7 payment[] uses the employee’s rate of compensation,” and not the employee’s “regular rate” used for overtime purposes. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 9:29 pm
Men have it easy compared to women: they don’t have to ponder the great Pantsuit v. [read post]
