Search for: "Murphy v. Secretary of State" Results 61 - 80 of 128
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm by Public Employment Law Press
This amendment set out New YorkState's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448.In Janus the high court held that states and public-sector unions may no longer require "nonconsenting employees" in a collective bargaining unit to pay an "agency shop fee" in lieu of becoming a member the certified or recognized… [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm by Public Employment Law Press
This amendment set out New YorkState's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448.In Janus the high court held that states and public-sector unions may no longer require "nonconsenting employees" in a collective bargaining unit to pay an "agency shop fee" in lieu of becoming a member the certified or recognized… [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 11:00 pm by Melina Padron
Luton Borough Council & Nottingham City Council & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Education [2011] EWHC 217 (Admin) (11 February 2011) Coalition cancellation of school-building program was unlawful. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 1:26 am by Melina Padron
AM v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 2486 (Admin) (03 October 2011) October 3, 2011 Mr Justice Silber in High Court: Refusal to amend 5 aspects of control order was lawful. [read post]
5 May 2020, 9:55 am by Josh Blackman
Rather, both the federal government and the court of appeals advanced, quietly, Justice Thomas's position on severability from Murphy v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 2:35 pm by Rekha Arulanantham
”         Yesterday, Perez joined the Department of Education’s Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights Russlynn Ali and a distinguished panel at the ACLU’s Washington Legislative Office to commemorate the 30th Anniversary of Plyler v. [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
The ALI’s incorporators included Chief Justice and former President William Howard Taft, future Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes, and former Secretary of State Elihu Root, Judge (later Justice) Benjamin N. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 1:15 am by Melina Padron
Mahajna v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 2481 (Admin) (30 September 2011) Detention of Israeli Arab activist Raed Salah Mahajna lawful save for 1.5 days when not told full reasons for detention. [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Less than two years ago, the Supreme Court applied it in Murphy v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 6:05 am by John Ramming Chappell
Murphy says that the administration has still not followed through on that commitment. [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 5:10 pm by INFORRM
 Data Privacy and Data Protection The ICO’s website had a news” Secretary of State for the Department for Digital, Culture Media & Sport and the Information Commissioner sign Memorandum of Understanding on data adequacy”. [read post]
16 May 2019, 9:05 pm by Bobby Chen
Holden of Oklahoma State University discussed the regulation of sports betting following the Supreme Court’s decision in Murphy v. [read post]