Search for: "Murphy v. Sharp*" Results 61 - 80 of 103
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Aug 2010, 6:32 pm by Mike Aylward
A few weeks later, the Fifth Circuit ruled in Comer v. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 4:58 pm by Joshua Cossin
” Texas often granted requests to have Christian chaplains in the execution room until last year’s Supreme Court ruling in Murphy v. [read post]
30 Aug 2015, 9:30 pm by Seth Kreimer
The Court flirted with (and Justice Murphy would have accepted) the Spiderman Theory of state action. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 5:10 pm by INFORRM
The Sydney Morning Herald reports that high-profile Sydney lawyer Chris Murphy is suing a newspaper publisher over a story about his appearance in court for his client, actor Matthew Newton. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 4:40 am by Phil Dixon
Officer was entitled to qualified immunity on First Amendment claim relating to livestreaming of a traffic stop, but claim for Town’s policy against livestreaming may proceed Sharpe v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 10:54 am by Bexis
The only reason removal is even possible prior to service is due to the advent of electronic case filing and waiver of service rules that could not have been foreseen when the current removal statute was enacted.Id. at *6 (discussing and attempting to analogize to Murphy Brothers, Inc., v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 4:24 am by SHG
What he’s referring to is the Supreme Court’s 1942 opinion, written by Justice Frank Murphy, in Chaplinksy v. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
All this suggests that providing pseudonymity to members of particular religious groups might violate the principle of the Texas Monthly v. [read post]
16 May 2019, 9:05 pm by Bobby Chen
Holden of Oklahoma State University discussed the regulation of sports betting following the Supreme Court’s decision in Murphy v. [read post]
13 Dec 2020, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
The same newspaper reports that high-profile Sydney criminal lawyer Chris Murphy may be required to submit to a medical examination as he sues The Daily Telegraph for defamation over a column he alleges portrays him as “so ravaged by age” he is unfit to practise. [read post]
8 May 2010, 8:53 am by INFORRM
The Legal Satyricon blog has a post about United States District Court for the District of New Jersey in Murphy v. [read post]