Search for: "Murray v. Super" Results 61 - 80 of 109
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2012, 4:50 am by Rosalind English
Filed under: Art. 10 | Freedom of Expression, Art. 8 | Right to Privacy/Family, Case comments, Case summaries, In the news, Technology Tagged: super injunctions [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
That view has since been upheld by the Court of Appeal in Johnson v Medical Defence Union [2007] EWCA Civ 262, although the narrowness of this interpretation was queried (without ruling) by the same court in another privacy case, Murray v Big Pictures (UK) Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 446. [read post]
27 Nov 2016, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
IPSO IPSO has rejected privacy complaints made against the Daily Mail, the Sun and the Daily Telegraph over pictures of Andy Murray’s baby daughter, Sofia Murray. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 10:36 am by INFORRM
([2001] QB 967) Campbell v MGN ([2004] 2 AC 457),  McKennitt v Ash ([2008] QB 73),  Lord Browne of Madingley v Associated Newspapers ([2008] 1 QB 103), Murray v Express Newspapers ([2009] Ch 481) – and that Mr Justice Eady was not party to a single one of these decisions (although appeals against his rulings were dismissed in McKennitt and Lord Browne). [read post]