Search for: "Murray v. Superior Court" Results 61 - 80 of 149
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2020, 2:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
Williamson of the Monroe County Common Pleas Court confirmed in the case of Farina v. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 5:00 am by Unknown
” But the whistleblower’s cert petition argues that Sarbanes-Oxley shifts the burden to the employer to prove a lack of retaliatory intent as an affirmative defense (Murray v. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 6:56 am
Where such malfeasance is not present, we agree with the Superior Court that the Murray standard strikes the appropriate balance between privacy and law enforcement. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 9:00 pm by Sinead Ring
The case is important for its discussion of the practical hurdles faced by the Superior Courts in applications for judicial review seeking an order of prohibition. [read post]
25 Nov 2016, 7:23 am
This post examines an opinion from the Superior Court of Pennsylvania:  Commonwealth v. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 7:27 am
The Maryland Court of Appeals issued an opinion in TransCare v. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 1:46 pm by Gordon Firemark
Defense argues that Murray was not employed by AEG, but rather was employed by MJ Status of Lawsuit:   Superior Court dismissed claims that AEG could be liable for Murray’s misconduct and breach of duty of care Superior Court sends to trial claim that AEG negligently hired Murray   “Real Calvin And Hobbes” Shut Down By Copyright Claim: Techdirt:… [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 7:40 am by John Jascob
Because the district court declined to instruct the jury as to retaliatory intent, the appeals court vacated the verdict in favor of the whistleblower and remanded for a new trial (Murray v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 1:37 am by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts Judgement was given in the appeal of A v Burke and Hare UKEATS/0020/20/DT. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 9:38 am by Kent Scheidegger
  He had a right to an explanation of the reason for rejection of his petition if he filed in superior court, but he chose not to. [read post]
26 Apr 2015, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
Judgments The following reserved judgment in media law cases are outstanding: OPO v MLA, heard 19 and 20 January 2015 (UK Supreme Court) Murray v Associated Newspapers, heard 21 January 2015 (Longmore, Ryder and Sharp LJJ) Various Claimants v MGN, heard 9-13, 18, 24-25 March 2015 (Mann J). [read post]