Search for: "My Name Ltd. v. Doe" Results 61 - 80 of 715
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2011, 7:10 am by Thomas G. Heintzman
  The British Columbia Supreme Court addressed this issue in its recent decision in Civil Construction Co Ltd v. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 7:48 am by Adam Baker
Turning to the second question Binnie J reviewed what was then the leading Canadian case on fundamental breach: Hunter Engineering Co. v Syncrude Canada Ltd. [1989] 1 SCR 426. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 4:57 pm by NL
Thomas-Ashley v Drum Housing Association Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 265 This is probably the biggest single week for dog-related possession claims ever. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 4:37 am by Jon Hyman
Keep a close eye on Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 7:23 am by Giles Peaker
Rendlesham Estates plc v Barr Ltd [2014] EWHC 3968 (TCC) upheld. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 5:55 pm by Howard Knopf
I have written frequently on my blog about this case and related issues in the past and addressed the main issue in the SCC in CBC v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 5:23 pm by INFORRM
In In re Skytours Travel Ltd, Doyle v Bergin [2010] IEHC 531 (9 July 201o) Laffoy J refused to hear a dispute between shareholders in camera. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
Canada (Attorney General), 2024 FC 829 at para. 5. [2] See 1395804 Ontario Ltd (Blacklock’s Reporter) v Canada (Attorney General), 2016 FC 1255, [2017] 2 FCR 256. [3] See 1395804 Ontario Ltd. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 11:44 pm
IPKat here and look out for my article in JIPLP.5. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 5:36 am by INFORRM
”  With reference to the Court of Appeal’s judgment in ABC & Ors v Telegraph Media Group Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 2329, we explain the dangers of politicians seeking to usurp the role of judges and why, contrary to what Lord Hain states, his disclosure was not in the public interest (at least not at this moment in time). [read post]
18 May 2020, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
  He considered the various factors set out in Murray v Express Newspapers plc [2009] Ch 481 [35] holding that “by far the weightiest factor leading to my conclusion that the Claimant does have a reasonable expectation of privacy in the Information is the final factor: the circumstances in which and the purposes for which the information came into the hands of the publisher” [125](ii). [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 1:19 pm by Giles Peaker
Snarecroft Ltd v Quantum Securities Ltd (2018) EWHC 2071 (Ch) This is a High Court decision from February, but it has just appeared on Bailii. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 12:14 pm by Giles Peaker
In the present case the certificate was given in the name of the landlord: Northwood Solihull Ltd. [read post]