Search for: "N. Strickland"
Results 61 - 80
of 133
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2012, 4:15 am
S. 648, 657, n. 21 (1984). [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 12:43 pm
Fenn, Judge.Representing Appellant: Diane Lozano, State Public Defender, PDP; Tina N. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 2:28 pm
Supreme Court has interpreted as requiring “reasonably effective assistance,” Strickland v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 6:40 pm
Our superior court explicitly stated in Denedo I, 66 M.J. at 129, that “[a]n attorney’s failure to advise an accused of potential deportation consequences of a guilty plea does not constitute deficient performance under Strickland. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 9:57 pm
In the same Term that the Court avoided the constitutional question in NAMUDNO, it used the same avoidance canon to narrowly construe a different provision of the Voting Rights Act in Bartlett v Strickland, and it applied constitutional avoidance (in deed if not in name) to narrowly construe Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act in Ricci v DeStefano, the controversial New Haven firefighters case. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
North American Indian Law: A Basic Bibliography (PDF) Patrick S. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
North American Indian Law: A Basic Bibliography (PDF) Patrick S. [read post]
21 May 2012, 2:15 pm
General Revenue Corp.Docket: 11-1175Issue(s): (1) Whether a prevailing defendant in a Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) case may be awarded costs for a lawsuit that was not “brought in bad faith and for the purpose of harassment,” when the FDCPA provides that “[o]n a finding by the court that an action under this section was brought in bad faith and for the purpose of harassment, the court may award to the defendant attorney’s fees reasonable in relation to… [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 6:18 am
Strickland v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 7:57 am
” (14 n.7) And, reviewing the whole course of conduct of Maples’ pro bono attorneys, the Court seemingly had little difficulty concluding that they crossed the line from negligence into abandonment. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 7:06 am
” (14 n.7) And, reviewing the whole course of conduct of Maples’ pro bono attorneys, the Court seemingly had little difficulty concluding that they crossed the line from negligence into abandonment. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 1:55 pm
BBT, LLC (212 & 311); CLAUDE BROUSSEAU & ANN MARIE DUGRE (303); E & N, INC. (103); JOSEPH FERRARO (211); RICHARD & JANE KISEL (205); LEONARD MARNELL (207); JAR ENTERPRISES, LLC (105 & 108); L. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 2:42 am
(The prejudice test from Strickland is a good example, expressly removing from consideration the possibility of an idiosyncratic jury.) [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 2:49 pm
Florida, 405 U.S. 427, 430 (1972): “[i]n some cases the properly admitted evidence of guilt is so overwhelming, and the prejudicial effect of the [erroneously admitted evidence] is so insignificant by comparison, that it is clear beyond a reasonable doubt that the improper use of the [evidence] was harmless error. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 3:34 pm
Florida, 405 U.S. 427, 430 (1972): “[i]n some cases the properly admitted evidence of guilt is so overwhelming, and the prejudicial effect of the [erroneously admitted evidence] is so insignificant by comparison, that it is clear beyond a reasonable doubt that the improper use of the [evidence] was harmless error. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 11:53 am
Florida, 405 U.S. 427, 430 (1972): “[i]n some cases the properly admitted evidence of guilt is so overwhelming, and the prejudicial effect of the [erroneously admitted evidence] is so insignificant by comparison, that it is clear beyond a reasonable doubt that the improper use of the [evidence] was harmless error. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 12:58 pm
Harlan Raymayer1:20-2:05pm Breakout Session II2:15-3:15pm “A Mock Ethics Consultation” Heather Frenz; Sheila Otto, RN, MA Wayne N. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 6:26 am
Lips, 997 F.2d at 812, n. 2. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 2:54 pm
(N.)VS.H. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 2:54 pm
(N.)VS.H. [read post]
