Search for: "NATIONAL FEDERATION, ETC. v. Brown" Results 61 - 80 of 108
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2013, 11:56 am by Guest Blogger
Try a “balance” construction of federalism: you’ll hit roadblocks very quickly, starting with the fact that the Constitution (unlike most federal constitutions) conspicuously and deliberately eschews any balancing rule. [read post]
8 May 2013, 9:44 am by Jodi Frankel
 The NLRB appealed that decision to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, where it remains pending at this time.The DC Circuit's May 7 opinion in National Association of Manufacturers, et al. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 4:00 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Can be a product, but most TMs won’t be famous anyway at the federal level. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
 Additionally, this tally pertains only to books (as opposed to separately printed reports, opinions, articles, etc.) published during the Justices’ lifetimes. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 2:12 pm
US law has also protected geographic indications through common law trade mark law without need for a registration ( the "Cognac" case - Institut National Des Appellations v Brown-Forman Corp (TTAB 1998)).However, when it comes to produce and products which are of such strong cultural and heritage state significance like the New Mexico chile, it is the state's government that usually applies for a certification mark. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:23 am by rbm3
GLICKSMAN Stanford, California: Stanford Economics and Finance, 2011 KF3790 .E27 2011 See Catalog Children -- Legal status, laws, etc. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 11:49 am by rbm3
GLICKSMAN Stanford, California: Stanford Economics and Finance, 2011 KF3790 .E27 2011 See Catalog Children -- Legal status, laws, etc. [read post]
23 May 2011, 11:54 am
 That question has been much debated by scholars of federal courts and is raised but not fully answered in the extremely important Supreme Court decision in Brown v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:08 pm by The Legal Blog
[Refer: David Gallai, `Polygraph evidence in federal courts: Should it be admissible? [read post]