Search for: "Nate Persily" Results 61 - 80 of 85
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jan 2010, 8:00 pm by pittlegalscholarship
 Columbia Nate Persily (Columbia), Race, Region, and Vote Choice in the 2008 Election: Implications for the Future of the Voting Rights Act. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 8:17 am by Rick.Hasen@lls.edu
Check this out: "Students in one Columbia Law School class will be able to do more than talk about what happens when Congressional districts are redrawn following the census. [read post]
7 Mar 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
On top of that, as Nate Persily has shown, the collapse of the old information regime and the rise of misinformation spread via social media creates new challenges in terms of the ability of Americans’ to be able to make rational political decisions consistent with their interests. [read post]
5 May 2022, 6:19 am by Daphne Keller
Testimony from the other witnesses -- Brandon Silverman, Nate Persily, Jim Harper, and Jonathan Haidt -- is here. [read post]
13 Feb 2010, 5:25 am by Darren Rosenblum
http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2010/02/11/politics/politicalhotsheet/entry6198284.shtml (h/t Joe.My.God) I have always been skeptical of the need to frame questions of fundamental rights through a marketing lens, and even of the significance of polling data in deciding such rights (in contrast to Nate Persily). [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 3:03 pm by Sandy Levinson
  Indeed, I confess that I have extremely mixed feelings about a Washington Post column by my friend Nate Persily and his associate Jon Cohen that emphasized that Americans are losing their faith in democracy and, importantly, "in each other. [read post]
31 May 2008, 8:26 am
That claim, too, is unsupported by empirical evidence (and may actually be misplaced, according to a recent study by Nate Persily and Steve Ansolabehere in the Harvard Law Review).Of all the bits of "data" that could be offered in favor of an i.d. requirement, voter perception is the one that least stands on its own -- except, that is, where it is needed to fill in large gaps that should have been filled with hard data regarding the prevalence of fraud or the effect of… [read post]
30 May 2017, 3:35 am by Edith Roberts
” Stanford Law School’s Legal Aggregate blog features a Q and A with “voting rights and redistricting expert Professor Nate Persily” on last week’s decision in Cooper v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 7:00 am by James Bickford
  At Balkinization, Nate Persily concludes – based on the results of a survey he conducted – that although “we are still divided as a country when it comes to perceived fairness of the Court’s decision in Bush v. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 3:01 am by Amy Howe
” Briefly: The Election Law Blog hosts a podcast with Nate Persily on the Court and social science evidence in election law cases at the Court. [read post]
4 Jul 2020, 6:13 pm by Law and Policy Lab
Conceived by renowned elections experts Professors Nate Persily (Stanford) and Charles Stewart (MIT), the Healthy Elections Project has developed a list of resources for implementing Vote-By-Mail, including resources and toolkits to assist counties in organizing and scaling-up their voting-by-mail operations. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 10:41 am by Rick Hasen
  Justice Alito changed everything, and the move toward loosening things up started with WRTL, as Nate Persily explained, and accelerated dramatically with CU. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 7:19 am by Katerina Linos and Kimberly Twist
Exerting this kind of influence would enable the court to function as a “Republican schoolmaster” and as a vehicle for social change, as scholars from Robert Dahl in 1957 to Nate Persily in 2013 have suggested. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 9:04 am
That's why I welcome the amicus brief linked here that was submitted in this case by three academics --Nate Persily, Charles Stewart and Steve Ansolabehere -- who dug into the details of the data to figure out where Obama's election fits in the annual rainfall measure. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 8:45 am by Richard Hasen
The story of the 2006 Amendments’ passage is fascinating and well told by Nate Persily and Rick Pildes. [read post]