Search for: "National Federation of Federal Employees, Local 29 v. Federal Labor Relations Authority"
Results 61 - 80
of 108
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm
§213(b)(10)(A) from the Fair Labor Standards Act's overtime-pay requirements. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 8:46 pm
The Final Rule mandates that employers pay a wage, that equals or exceeds the highest of the monthly AEWR (described more below), collective bargaining agreement, or applicable minimum wage set by court or law (e.g., Federal, State or local minimum wage), free and clear at least twice monthly during the entire certified period of employment. [read post]
The National Labor Relations Board says “Happy Labor Day” with Flurry of Late Summer Pro-Union Moves
9 Sep 2015, 12:59 pm
NLRB’s New Successorship Rule Raises the Question of Whether Worker Retention Statutes Are Preempted By Federal Law Also on August 27, 2015, the National Labor Relations Board decided in GVS Properties, LLC, 29-CA-077359, 362 NLRB No. 194 (Aug. 27, 2015), the issue of when an employer required to hire its predecessors’ employees under a state or local worker retention law becomes a successor (under labor law) and is… [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 4:56 am
As relevant here, plaintiffs sue GoDaddy for defamation; they sue the Teamsters for retaliation in violation of sections 7 and 8 of the National Labor Relations Act (`NLRA’), 29 U.S. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 11:40 am
READ PARTS I-V (pp. 101-138 in SSRN version). [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 9:06 pm
Those workers, however, voted against being represented either by the Service Employees’ Local 73 or Council 31 of the American Federation of State County and Municipal Employees. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 5:21 am
§ 152, excluded unauthorized aliens from all protection by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB). [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 7:05 pm
National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]
29 May 2013, 10:51 pm
Despite ACA’ amendments to HIPAA’s bona fide wellness program rules and the 11th Circuit’s rejection of an EEOC challenge in Broward County v. [read post]
26 May 2013, 1:33 pm
For Help or More Information If you need help with preparing these or other ACA compliance or with reviewing and updating, administering or defending your group health or other employee benefit, human resources, insurance, health care matters or related documents or practices, please contact the author of this update, Cynthia Marcotte Stamer. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 12:03 pm
MulhallIssue: Whether an employer and union may violate Section 302 of the Labor-Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 4:24 pm
Martone yesterday issued an Order granting summary judgment to the State of Arizona in the National Labor Relations Board's lawsuit challenging an amendment to the state's constitution. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 11:22 pm
Stamer is recognized, internationally, nationally and locally for her more than 24 years of work, advocacy, education and publications on leading health and managed care, employee benefit, human resources and related workforce, insurance and financial services, and health care matters. [read post]
11 May 2012, 9:42 am
See 29 C.F.R. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 7:42 am
Stamer is recognized, internationally, nationally and locally for her more than 24 years of work, advocacy, education and publications on cutting edge health and managed care, employee benefit, human resources and related workforce, insurance and financial services, and health care matters. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 10:20 am
Ironworkers Local Union 68 v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 2:49 pm
Stamer is recognized, internationally, nationally and locally for her more than 24 years of work, advocacy, education and publications on labor and employment, employee benefit and related workforce, insurance and health care matters. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 7:15 am
The clinic and its doctors are deemed federal employees under the Federally Supported Health Centers Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. 233(g)-(n), and shielded from liability under the Federal Tort Claims Act. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 7:15 am
The clinic and its doctors are deemed federal employees under the Federally Supported Health Centers Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. 233(g)-(n), and shielded from liability under the Federal Tort Claims Act. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 10:27 am
This existing but undeveloped body of federal law helps shed light on the Supreme Court’s recent decision in AT& T v. [read post]
