Search for: "Natural Resources v. AMERICAN &C. CO." Results 61 - 80 of 245
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2016, 9:23 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  One filing v. three, we also felt that there were some things left unsaid, in part b/c at the hearings proponents were given a lot of opportunity to explain their cases, so we ran out of time. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 7:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  This fact underscores  the de facto syllogism in Dred Scott that a) American citizens have a right to bear arms; b) Blacks have no such right; therefore c) Blacks cannot be citizens. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm by Anthony B. Cavender
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., et al., 467 U.S. 837 (1984) and Chevron deference did not play a large role in the Court’s decision, which was concerned to some extent with IRS regulations. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 9:22 am by Christa Culver
Army Corps of EngineersDocket: 10-1059Issue(s): The court of appeals held in this case that land transfers by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to the State of South Dakota pursuant to the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 did not violate §§ 605(b)(3) and (c)(1)(B) of that Act because they did not include lands within the “external boundaries” of the Yankton Sioux Reservation. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 2:23 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
See 20 CFR 655.731(c)(10)(i)(C), Vanderbilt University v. [read post]
5 Jul 2008, 11:05 am
’: (IP finance), Allied Security Trust – High-tech companies pool resources to fight trolls: (IAM), (Techdirt), (Patent Prospector), (Ars Technica), (Technological Innovation and Intellectual Property) Global - Copyright On distinguishing between creative commons, the public domain, and all rights reserved – confusion in mainstream media: (creativecommons.org), Inside views: a new business model for the music industry explained: (Intellectual Property Watch),… [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 6:55 am by John Elwood
The court called for the views of the solicitor general in Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. [read post]