Search for: "New v. New"
Results 61 - 80
of 185,255
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2024, 9:30 pm
Ralph Richard Banks, Standford Law, asks, Brown v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 2:56 pm
Anteau, “The Northern District of Illinois v. the Internet: How Chicago Became the Center of Schedule A Trademark Infringement Litigation”; Law.Com, December 19, 2023. [read post]
10 May 2024, 2:53 pm
Kavanaugh spoke at some length about his opinion in Labrador v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 12:57 pm
Hearst v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 11:23 am
10 May 2024, 10:45 am
"Mandated economic self-sufficiency from state and refugee perspectives: refugee integration policy and practice in Sweden and New Zealand," Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, Latest Articles, 1 May 2024 [open access] Plan Nacional de Reasentamiento y Vías Complementarias de Admisión a la República Argentina para personas refugiadas, apátridas y necesitadas de protección internacional (Comisión Nacional Para Los… [read post]
10 May 2024, 10:38 am
The post US Supreme Court upholds civil forfeiture without immediate hearing appeared first on JURIST - News. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:31 am
Music producer Sherman Nealy initiated what would become Warner Chappell Music, Inc. v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:01 am
Circuit’s application of the Fitzgerald test in Blassingame v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 8:00 am
District Court for the Western District of New York (EEOC v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:45 am
Governor of New Jersey3abrogated on other grounds by Murphy v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am
Indeed, even in circumstances where an arbitrator makes errors of law or fact, courts will not assume the role of overseers to conform the award to their sense of justice" (Matter of New York State Correctional Officers & Police Benevolent Assn. v State of New York, 94 NY2d 321, 326 [1999]). [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am
Indeed, even in circumstances where an arbitrator makes errors of law or fact, courts will not assume the role of overseers to conform the award to their sense of justice" (Matter of New York State Correctional Officers & Police Benevolent Assn. v State of New York, 94 NY2d 321, 326 [1999]). [read post]
10 May 2024, 5:10 am
Schwartz v Oshman & Mirisola, LLP 2024 NY Slip Op 31592(U) May 3, 2024 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 155780/2023 Judge: Dakota D. [read post]
10 May 2024, 5:00 am
# # #DECISIONM-P. v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 4:34 am
” People v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 4:05 am
In Balchan v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 3:27 am
See State v. [read post]
