Search for: "New York Cent. R. Co. v. United States"
Results 61 - 80
of 97
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2009, 5:05 pm
The prescriptive period for adverse possession varies between states: New York - ten years; Pennsylvania - twenty one years; Alaska - seven years under color and claim of title or ten years under a mistaken belief that the real property which is the subject of the adverse possession, lies within the boundaries of the adjacent property owned by the adverse possessor. [read post]
16 May 2009, 9:00 pm
But even on the bench, Ginsburg has embraced gender as a source of diversity, and her opinions have challenged male judges for embracing gender-based stereotypes.In United States v. [read post]
11 May 2009, 4:05 am
Co. v. [read post]
7 May 2009, 2:05 pm
" They argued that "if CIL is not federal common law, ‘a tort . . . committed in violation of the law of nations' would not arise under ‘the Laws of the United States' within the meaning of Article III, rendering Filartiga-type suits constitutionally suspect. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 4:15 am
Approximately one month later, the EEOC issued a Dismissal and Notice of Rights, which explained that the agency's "‘review of the evidence . . . fail[ed] to indicate that a violation ha[d] occurred,'" and notified each employee of his or her right to sue.The employees then filed a lawsuit against the employer in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York,… [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 9:00 pm
See United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 7:31 am
AUTO - SUM - MULTIPLE IMEs - COOPERATION Matter of New York Cent. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 4:15 am
Lawsuit for libel brought against public official turns on whether the statements objected to were uttered with "actual malice"Shulman v Hunderfund, 2009 NY Slip Op 02263, Decided on March 26, 2009, Court of AppealsIn the words of Justice Smith, "In this action for libel by a public figure, the record does not clearly and convincingly show that the statements in question were made with "actual malice," as required by New York Times Co.… [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 8:10 am
The case is now pending before the United States Appeals Court for the Second Circuit. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
Bemus Point Cent. [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 8:48 am
Co. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 10:36 pm
We've praised courts that have gotten this issue right - most significantly the New York Court of Appeals in the Arons case. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 11:45 am
Tompkins‟ case comports with the United States and Florida Constitutions. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:33 pm
: (IP finance), MARQUES international advertising portal goes live: (Class 46) Global - Patents Using patent landscaping analytics to improve the quality of M & A decisions: a review of Cox Enterprises’ $300M purchase of Adify: (IP Asset Maximiser Blog), Universities reap royalty rewards; investors ignore IP at their peril: (IAM), Top IP-owning nations claim faster patent processing; near harmonisation deal: (Intellectual Property Watch), Bosch, Xerox and Dupont sign up… [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 9:32 pm
Citing its prior decision in Aspen Skiing Co. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 6:00 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 4:13 pm
United States, 330 F.2d 719, 721-22 (5th Cir. 1963) (citing New York Cent. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 4:16 am
" (Gregg v. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 3:09 pm
District Court for the Southern District of New York dismissed the complaint. [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 1:00 am
Here is IP Think Tank's weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
