Search for: "New York Times Company v. Sullivan" Results 61 - 80 of 354
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
First Amendment Protection AI programs' output should be as protected by the First Amendment as the output of the New York Times. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Dan Sullivan brought the committee an email from employees of the water company known as the Justice, Equity or Diversity and Inclusion Committee. [read post]
30 May 2007, 1:28 am
Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company, a 5-4 decision that makes it harder for employees to sue within the statutory time limit. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 12:50 pm by Eugene Volokh
I also noted last week that the New York state government defendants didn't file a response to the petition. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 3:47 am by Robert McKennon
The plaintiff’s mother, Kathleen Sullivan, was employed by the New York Telephone Company, a predecessor entity to Verizon, from 1970 to 1978, during which period her annual income was $18,600. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 10:00 pm by Kevin LaCroix
However, the court never conclusively stated whether it was applying New York law; rather, Judge Sullivan said only that the outcome was the same whether New York or Pennsylvania law applied. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 1:34 am
Source: New York Legislative Retrieval System (LRS), Search run July 19, 2009. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 3:37 pm
The New York case of Travelers Indemnity Company, cited above, was decided in 1962. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 6:00 am by Alea Al-Aghbari
Actual Malice tells the full story of New York Times v. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 12:36 am
Source: New York State Legislative Retrieval System (LRS), January 15, 2007 For your information we are posting the entire New York Legislature 2007 Chapter Law List as retrieved from the New York Legislative Retrieval System on January 15, 2008. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 8:00 am
After rejecting Pirate's contention that the "actual malice" standard from New York Times Co. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 11:01 am by Howard Knopf
For example, because the USA has its famous “absence of malice” defence based upon the landmark New York Times v. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
The New York Times and Politico petitioned Howell to unseal portions of the grand jury proceedings in October, citing the historic nature of the secret rulings she had issued. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 2:00 am by John Day
Div. 1991) (stating that New York law does not recognize a defamation claim where the plaintiff voluntarily republished the alleged defamatory words); Doe v. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 8:15 am by Ilya Somin
Sullivan by drawing on previously unexplored sources, including the archives of the New York Times Company and civil rights leaders. [read post]