Search for: "Nixon v. Fitzgerald"
Results 61 - 74
of 74
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2017, 8:33 am
Legally speaking, is a tweet from @realDonaldTrump, the personal account, covered by the presidential immunity articulated by the Supreme Court in Nixon v. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 12:00 pm
Nixon, 418 U.S. 683 (1974). [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 1:27 pm
The opinion begins: Since the Supreme Court's decision in Nixon v. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 6:20 am
Fitzgerald, French v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 7:22 am
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 6:00 am
“The Bush v. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 1:04 pm
In Westfall v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 6:07 pm
Fitzgerald case on behalf of the State of Wisconsin. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
That argument is based on a line of civil cases establishing that presidents can’t be held liable via monetary damages for their official actions—more specifically, as the Supreme Court held in 1981 in Nixon v. [read post]
21 Apr 2024, 2:25 pm
Thus, Patrick Fitzgerald, the U.S. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 2:30 am
Nixon v. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 5:54 am
This is mainly because the Supreme Court in Nixon v. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 9:00 am
Again, the president is not above the law (as the dissenters in Nixon v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
