Search for: "Nollan v. California Coastal Commission"
Results 61 - 80
of 97
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2013, 1:47 pm
California Coastal Commission, 483 U.S. 825 (1987), and Dolan v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 1:36 pm
California Coastal Commission and Dolan v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 4:46 am
California Coastal Commission (1987) and Dolan v. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 3:49 pm
California Coastal Commission (1987) and Dolan v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 11:38 am
California Coastal Commission (1987) and Dolan v. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 4:30 am
In Nollan v. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 2:27 pm
California Coastal Commission, in which the Court held that it was unconstitutional for the state to require that a property owner grant an easement across his property for public beach access as a condition of rebuilding his home because there was no "nexus" between the dedication requirement and the owner's plan, and 1994's Dolan v. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 1:40 pm
California Coastal Commission, in 1987, and Scalia was part of a five-Justice majority in the 1994 case of Dolan v. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 7:46 pm
In 1987, in the case of Nollan v. [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 11:45 am
California Coastal Commission, 483 U.S. 825 (1987), and Dolan v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 8:01 am
California Coastal Commission (1987) and Dolan v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 9:26 am
California Coastal Commission, 483 U.S. 825 (1987), and Dolan v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 12:49 am
California Coastal Commission, decided a mere three days after Dole, recognized precisely this. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 6:37 am
Coastal Commission). [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 3:34 pm
See Nollan v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 11:12 am
California Coastal Commission (1987) and Dolan v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 7:10 pm
Florida Florida v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 9:50 am
California Coastal Commission, 483 U.S. 825 (1987), and Dolan v. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 6:13 am
California Coastal Commission, which by definition implicate no compensation issues, fall outside the purview of the state-procedures rule outlined in Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
California Coastal Commission did not apply to the ordinance where the ordinance did not require Watson to dedicate any portion of his property to either the City's or the public's use. [read post]
