Search for: "North Dakota v. United States of America" Results 61 - 80 of 103
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jul 2014, 10:12 am
Under the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Quill Corp. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
As it explained in United States v. [read post]
Moreover, in his opinion, these types of lawsuit violated rights guaranteed by the United States and North Carolina constitutions. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 8:00 am by Robert Kreisman
  The law in states attempting to cap medical malpractice lawsuits and damages had been stricken down in Illinois, Missouri, Alabama, Georgia, New Hampshire, North Dakota, Oregon, Washington and Wisconsin. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
  We found a lot of cases – at least something useful from 42 jurisdictions:  all except Delaware, Hawaii, Maine, Nebraska, New Mexico, Oregon, Puerto Rico, Rhode Island, South Dakota, and Wisconsin.As alluded to earlier, plaintiffs sometimes try to overcome inconvenient facts about a failure to read warnings with quirky arguments that the defendant should have communicated in a different fashion. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
The North Dakota legislature also queued up a personhood amendment, which says that life begins at conception for all purposes; that proposed amendment to the North Dakota Constitution will go to the state’s voters in November 2013. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 9:39 am by Bill Raftery
However, that effort was struck down by Federal courts only a day or two after the election (Awad v. [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 2:51 am by SHG
, North Dakota, and Utah (self-study only). ? [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 8:00 am by John Hopkins
"Whether that is in the Everglades, or whether that is in the eastern Gulf region, or whether that's in North Dakota, we need to go where the energy is. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 5:37 pm by Christa Culver
North Dakota, 504 U.S. 298 (1992), that the Commerce Clause prevents a state from imposing a sales or use tax on a company lacking physical presence in the state applies to other state taxes, such as an excise tax on conducting business within the state; and (2) whether petitioner's minimal contacts within the state are insufficient to establish a “physical presence” within the meaning of Quill.Certiorari stage… [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 1:49 pm by Nietzer
It was enacted in 32 United States jurisdictions: Alaska, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Texas, U.S. [read post]
26 May 2011, 5:29 am by Mandelman
 The State of North Carolina would be better off just leaving his congressional seat empty. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm by Bexis
 At least the state of the art at the time of the plaintiff’s use applies – unknown and later discovered risks are irrelevant. [read post]